Mahan v. Perez et al
Filing
112
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 111 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed by PAA Chudavala, Kotlyard, Merrill Michael, City of New York. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 24, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
LINDA M. ROSS (SBN 133874)
lross@publiclawgroup.com
STEVEN P. SHAW (SBN 242593)
sshaw@publiclawgroup.com
RENNE SLOAN HOLTZMAN SAKAI LLP
1220 Seventh Street, Suite 300
Berkeley, California 94710
Telephone: (510) 995-5800
Facsimile: (415) 678-3838
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY OF NEW YORK, MICHAEL MERRILL
MALTIBEN CHUDAVALA
MICHAEL KOTLYAR
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
CHAUNCEY M. MAHAN,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Case No.: 3:16-cv02024-JST
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER
vs.
Juan Perez; Miles Cooley; Jordan W. Siev, and
The Law Firm of Reed Smith;
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal
corporation; Los Angeles Police Department;
Officer Shepal, officer; Beth Sheppard, Detective;
Tim Torsney, Lieutenant; Harvey Martin,
Detective; Any Other Unknown Officers; in their
official capacities; CITY OF NEW YORK, a
municipal corporation; New York Police
Department; Merrill Michael, Sergeant; PAA
Chudavala, Officer; Lt. Kotlyard, Lieutenant; Any
Other Unknown Officers; in their official
capacities,
22
Date: November 3, 2016
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Place Courtroom 9, 19th Floor
450 Golden Gate Ave.
San Francisco, CA
Action Filed: April 18, 2016
Amended Complaint Filed: April 25, 2016
Judge: (Hon.) Jon S. Tigar
Defendants.
23
STIPULATION
24
25
WHEREAS:
26
1.
Defendants City of New York, Michael Merrill, Maltiben Chudavala and Michael
27 Kotlyar (“City defendants”) filed a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint on September
28 12, 2016.
No.: 3:16-cv02024-JST
-1-
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
2.
1
Plaintiff Chauncey Mahan (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion for Extension of Time to
2 Respond to the City defendants’ motion on October 3, 2016.
3.
3
The City defendants did not file an opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of
4 Time, and on October 5, 2016, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request, providing him with an extension
5 until October 17, 2016 to file his opposition to City defendants’ motion. Plaintiff then filed his
6 opposition on October 17, 2016.
4.
7
Based on the October 17, 2016 filing date, in accordance with Local Rule 7-3, the
8 City defendants’ new deadline for their reply brief is October 24.
5.
9
While the City defendants’ have attempted to complete their reply brief by the
10 October 24 deadline, counsel for the City defendants has informed Plaintiff that both the City of
11 New York’s Office of Corporation Counsel and outside counsel for defendants had prior
12 commitments scheduled during the week preceding this new October 24 deadline and, accordingly,
13 necessitate a one-week extension of time in order to complete their reply, i.e., until October 31,
14 2016.
15
6.
Plaintiff has courteously agreed to the City defendants’ requested extension.
16
7.
The hearing on City defendants’ motion is currently set for November 3, 2016. (The
17 parties defer to the Court regarding whether additional time is needed for a disposition on City
18 defendants’ motion.)
19
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that the City of New York
20 Michael Merrill, Maltiben Chudavala and Michael Kotlyar’s reply in support of their Motion to
21 Dismiss shall be due on October 31, 2016.
22
23 Dated: October 21, 2016
RENNE SLOAN HOLTZMAN SAKAI LLP
24
By: /s/ Steven P. Shaw
Steven P. Shaw
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF NEW YORK, MICHAEL MERRILL,
MALTIBEN CHUDAVALA AND MICHAEL
KOTLYAR
25
26
27
28
No.: 16-cv02024-JST
-2-
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
1 Dated: October 21, 2016
CHAUNCEY MAHAN
2
By:
3
4
/s/ Chauncey M. Mahan
Chauncey Mahan
Pro Se Plaintiff
5
6
[PROPOSED] ORDER
7
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO
8
9 ORDERED.
10
11
Dated:
October ___, 2016
24
12
By:
13
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
No.: 16-cv02024-JST
-3-
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?