Electronic Frontier Foundation v. United States Department of Justice

Filing 36

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 35 Stipulation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

MARK RUMOLD (SBN 279060)
[e-mail]
NATHAN D. CARDOZO (SBN 259097)
[e-mail]
AARON MACKEY (SBN 286647)
[e-mail]
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
815 Eddy Street
San Francisco, CA 94109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12

ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION,

13
14
15
16

Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE,

17

Defendant.

18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 16-cv-02041-HSG
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING
PLAINTIFF’S REPLY

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

16-CV-02041-HSG

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

The parties stipulate and respectfully request the Court extend the deadline for filing

2

Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment until November 28, 2016.

3

Good cause exists for this request as follows:

4

1.

The Department of Justice (the “Department”) filed its Reply in Support of its Motion

5

for Partial Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiff’s Cross Motion for Partial Summary

6

Judgment on November 3, 2016.

7

2.

After reviewing the agency’s brief, Plaintiff contacted the Department by email on

8

November 7, 2016 to discuss narrowing Plaintiff’s request and, thus, further reducing the matters in

9

dispute in this litigation.

10

3.

By email to Plaintiff on November 11, 2016, the Department represented that it

11

would require additional time to discuss the proposed narrowing, both internally and with other

12

affected government agencies. Thus, the Department did not expect it could provide a full response

13

before the filing of Plaintiff’s Reply brief, currently scheduled for November 17, 2016.

14
15
16
17

4.

To allow for further discussions between the parties before the filing of Plaintiff’s

Reply, the parties agreed that the deadline for filing should be extended.
Accordingly, the parties respectfully request the Court extend the deadline for the filing of
Plaintiff’s Reply until November 28, 2016.

18
19

DATED: November 14, 2016

20

/s/ Mark Rumold
Mark Rumold
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION
815 Eddy Street
San Francisco, CA 94109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION

21
22
23
24
25

DATED: November 14, 2016

26

BENJAMIN C. MIZER
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
BRIAN STRETCH
United States Attorney

27

1

28
16-cv-02041-HSG

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

EL
LIZABETH J SHAPIRO
J.
O
De
eputy Branch Director
h

2

____
/s/ Rodney P
Patton
RO
ODNEY PAT
TTON
Sen Counse
nior
el
JU
ULIA A. BER
RMAN Bar N 241415
No.
Tri Attorney
ial
Un
nited States D
Department of Justice
Civ Division, Federal Pro
vil
,
ograms Bran
nch
20 Massachuse Avenue, N.W.
etts
,
Wa
ashington, D
D.C. 20001
Telephone: [phone]
02)
Facsimile: (20 616-8470
02)
0

3
4
5
6
7
8

Atto
orneys for D
Defendant

9

DE
ECLARATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RU
ULE 5-1(I)(
(3)

10
11

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5C
-1(i)(3), I, Mark Rumold declare th I obtained the concu
M
d,
hat
urrence of

12

Rodney Patton, coun
nsel for Def
fendant, Un
nited States Department of Justice, in the filin of this
ng

13

documen
nt.

14
15

I declare und penalty of perjury un
der
o
nder the law of the Un
ws
nited States that the fore
egoing is
true and correct. Exe
ecuted this 14th day of November, 2
N
2016 in San F
Francisco, C
California.

16

/s/ Mark Ru
umold
Mark Ru
Rumold

17
18
19

Upon conside
U
eration of th parties’ stipulation co
he
s
oncerning a extension of time in which to
an
20
file a Pla
aintiff’s Repl it is:
ly,
21
ORDERED that plaintiff deadline to file its Re
O
t
f’s
t
eply is exten
nded to Nove
ember 28, 20
016.
22
23
24

DATED: November 14, 2016
:
r

25

__________
__________
___________
__________
__
HON. HAY
YWOOD S. G
GILLIAM, J
JR.
DISTRICT COURT JU
UDGE

26
27
2

28
41-HSG
16-cv-0204

ST
TIPULATION AND [PROPO
OSED] ORDER
R