Axline v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al

Filing 27

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. STIPULATION AND ORDER (Docket #25). Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/25/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2016)

Download PDF
Reset Form UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT   NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA  Buz Nay Axline Case No. C 16-cv-02052-RS , Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am., et al. , Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:    Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)   Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5.   Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)  s  Private ADR (specify process and provider) The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:    the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered.)   s  other requested deadline:   Signed: /s/ Teresa S. Renaker Attorney for Plaintiff   Signed: /s/ Anna M. Martin Date: July 20, 2016 Date: July 20, 2016   IT IS SO ORDERED IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: D RDERE OO IT IS S Print Form R NIA UNIT ED x   S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S Attorney for Defendant  LI RT   FO NO Seeborg U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE  Richard Judge A H Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: ER C “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or N F “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” D TO IS T RIC Form ADR-Stip rev. 6-2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?