Axline v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
Filing
27
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. STIPULATION AND ORDER (Docket #25). Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/25/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2016)
Reset Form
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Buz Nay Axline
Case No. C 16-cv-02052-RS
,
Plaintiff(s)
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am., et al.
,
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5.
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
s
Private ADR (specify process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered.)
s
other requested deadline:
Signed: /s/ Teresa S. Renaker
Attorney for Plaintiff
Signed: /s/ Anna M. Martin
Date: July 20, 2016
Date: July 20, 2016
IT IS SO ORDERED
IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
Print Form
R NIA
UNIT
ED
x
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
Attorney for Defendant
LI
RT
FO
NO
Seeborg
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Richard
Judge
A
H
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices:
ER
C
“Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or
N
F
“Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.”
D
TO
IS T RIC
Form ADR-Stip rev. 6-2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?