Axline v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER for Dispositive Motion Briefing Schedule. Motion Hearing set for 2/23/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/14/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Teresa S. Renaker – CA State Bar No. 187800 Margaret E. Hasselman – CA State Bar No. 228529 Kirsten Scott – CA State Bar No. 253464 RENAKER HASSELMAN LLP 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 944 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 653-1733 Facsimile: (415) 727-5079 teresa@renakerhasselman.com margo@renakerhasselman.com kirsten@renakerhasselman.com 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO/OAKLAND DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 BUZ NAY AXLINE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ) AMERICA and CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE ) WEST LONG-TERM DISABILITY BENEFIT ) PLAN, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. 3:16-cv-02052-RS STIPULATION FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON WHEREAS, at the initial case management conference held September 1, 2016, the Court directed the parties to agree on a briefing schedule for dispositive motions; and 22 WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed on a schedule; 23 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate to the following briefing schedule: 24 Plaintiff’s motion filed: 25 Defendants’ cross-motion and opposition (one brief) filed: January 12, 2017 26 Plaintiff’s opposition and reply (one brief) filed: January 26, 2017 27 Defendants’ reply filed: February 9, 2017 28 Hearing: February 23, 2017, 1:30 p.m. December 22, 2016 1 SO STIPULATED: 2 Dated: September 9, 2016 3 RENAKER HASSELMAN LLP By: /s/ Teresa S. Renaker Teresa S. Renaker 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff 5 Dated: September 9, 2016 RIMAC MARTIN APC 6 7 /s/ Anna M. Martin Anna M. Martin 8 Attorneys for Defendants By: ATTESTATION 9 10 11 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. /s/ Teresa S. Renaker Teresa S. Renaker 12 13 [PROPOSED] ORDER 14 15 16 17 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 9/14 Dated: ___________, 2016 _____________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PAGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?