Axline v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER for Dispositive Motion Briefing Schedule. Motion Hearing set for 2/23/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/14/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Teresa S. Renaker – CA State Bar No. 187800
Margaret E. Hasselman – CA State Bar No. 228529
Kirsten Scott – CA State Bar No. 253464
RENAKER HASSELMAN LLP
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 944
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 653-1733
Facsimile: (415) 727-5079
teresa@renakerhasselman.com
margo@renakerhasselman.com
kirsten@renakerhasselman.com
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO/OAKLAND DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
BUZ NAY AXLINE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF )
AMERICA and CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE )
WEST LONG-TERM DISABILITY BENEFIT )
PLAN,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No. 3:16-cv-02052-RS
STIPULATION FOR DISPOSITIVE
MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
WHEREAS, at the initial case management conference held September 1, 2016, the
Court directed the parties to agree on a briefing schedule for dispositive motions; and
22
WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed on a schedule;
23
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate to the following briefing schedule:
24
Plaintiff’s motion filed:
25
Defendants’ cross-motion and opposition (one brief) filed: January 12, 2017
26
Plaintiff’s opposition and reply (one brief) filed:
January 26, 2017
27
Defendants’ reply filed:
February 9, 2017
28
Hearing:
February 23, 2017, 1:30 p.m.
December 22, 2016
1
SO STIPULATED:
2
Dated: September 9, 2016
3
RENAKER HASSELMAN LLP
By:
/s/ Teresa S. Renaker
Teresa S. Renaker
4
Attorneys for Plaintiff
5
Dated: September 9, 2016
RIMAC MARTIN APC
6
7
/s/ Anna M. Martin
Anna M. Martin
8
Attorneys for Defendants
By:
ATTESTATION
9
10
11
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document
has been obtained from each of the other signatories.
/s/ Teresa S. Renaker
Teresa S. Renaker
12
13
[PROPOSED] ORDER
14
15
16
17
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
9/14
Dated: ___________, 2016
_____________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PAGE 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?