GONZALEZ et al v. MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION et al

Filing 32

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO SUBMIT SINGLE-SIDED CHAMBERS COPIES OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND SUPPORTING PAPERS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND COURT'S STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 09/27/16. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2016)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

IRIS GONZALEZ, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

v.
MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-02087-MMC
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO
SUBMIT SINGLE-SIDED CHAMBERS
COPIES OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND
SUPPORTING PAPERS IN
COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL
RULES AND COURT'S STANDING
ORDERS

12
13

On September 23, 2016, defendants Mazda Motor Corporation and Mazda Motor

14

of America, Inc. electronically filed their “Motion to Dismiss Claims Alleged in First

15

Amended Complaint.” Defendants violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the

16

Court's Standing Orders, however, by failing to provide a chambers copy of the

17

declaration of Darlene M. Cho filed in support of said motion. See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7)

18

(requiring parties “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is

19

electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’”); see also Standing Orders For Civil

20

Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

21

Moreover, none of the chambers copies defendants did submit are in single-sided

22

format. See Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M.

23

Chesney ¶ 2; Civil L.R. 3-4 (setting forth requirements for “papers presented for filing”);

24

Civil L.R. 3-4(c)(2) (providing “text must appear on one side only”).

25

Defendants are hereby ORDERED to comply with the Civil Local Rules and the

26

Court's Standing Orders by immediately submitting single-sided chambers copies of the

27

following documents: (1) “Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Claims

28

Alleged in First Amended Complaint;” (2) “Memorandum of Points and Authorities in

1

Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Claims Alleged in the First Complaint;” (3)

2

“Declaration of Darlene M. Cho in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Claims

3

Alleged in First Amended Complaint;” and (4) “[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’

4

Motion to Dismiss Claims Alleged in First Amended Complaint.”

5

Defendants are hereby advised that if they fail in the future to comply with the Civil

6

Local Rules and the Court's Standing Orders to provide a single-sided chambers copy of

7

each electronically filed document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not

8

limited to, striking from the record any electronically filed document for which a chambers

9

copy has not been timely provided to the Court.

10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Dated: September 27, 2016
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2