United States of America et al v. Academy Mortgage Corporation

Filing 96

STIPULATION AND ORDER re #95 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Postpone Case Management Conference filed by Academy Mortgage Corporationn. CMC reset for 9/20/18 at 9:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/20/18. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Weiner Brodsky Kider PC Mitchel H. Kider, CA Bar No. 116479 1300 19th Street, NW Fifth Floor Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: 202.628.2000 Facsimile: 202.628.2011 Email: kider@thewbkfirm.com 8 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. Thomas M. McInerney, CA Bar No. 162055 Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 One Market Plaza San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415.442.4810 Facsimile: 415.442.4870 Email: tmm@ogletreedeakins.com 9 Attorneys for Defendant Academy Mortgage Corporation 5 6 7 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. 14 GWEN THROWER, Case No. 16-CV-02120-EMC 15 JOINT MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO POSTPONE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 16 Plaintiff, v. 17 ACADEMY MORTGAGE CORPORATION, 18 Defendant. 19 Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 16-CV-02120-EMC JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO POSTPONE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 3 Defendant Academy Mortgage Corporation and Relator Gwen Thrower hereby jointly request, by and through their respective counsel, as follows: 1. The Initial Case Management Conference was initially set for July 13, 2016, 4 5 6 7 8 and has previously been reset to March 27, 2017, April 27, 2017, July 27, 2017, January 18, 2018, March 1, 2018, and June 28, 2018. 2. On November 30, 2017, the Court heard argument regarding the United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss Relator’s Amended Complaint. At that time, the 9 10 11 12 Court asked for further briefing on the United States’ Motion to Dismiss. 3. The supplemental briefing concerning the United States’ Motion to Dismiss was completed on January 4, 2018. 13 14 4. On April 25, 2018, the Court ordered Relator to proffer evidence in support 15 of her request for an evidentiary hearing on the United States’ Motion to Dismiss, and for 16 the United States to respond to Relator’s submission. 17 5. Relator’s evidentiary proffer was submitted on May 17, 2018, and the United 18 19 20 21 States’ response was submitted on May 31, 2018. 6. The Court has held Academy’s Motion to Dismiss and its Motion to Transfer Venue in abeyance pending its decision on the United States’ Motion to Dismiss the 22 23 24 25 26 Amended Complaint. See Dkt. No. 64; Dkt. No. 72. 7. Given the United States’ Motion to Dismiss and its possible effect on the litigation, and given the Court’s decision to hold Academy’s Motions to Dismiss and to Transfer Venue in abeyance pending its decision on the United States’ Motion, counsel for 27 28 Relator and Defendant have conferred, and both have agreed to, and therefore jointly 29 30 31 JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO POSTPONE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 3 request, a postponement of the Initial Case Management Conference and the deadline to file the Case Management Statement. 8. Counsel for the above Parties have conferred and agreed to, and therefore 4 5 6 7 8 jointly request, that the Court postpone the deadline for the Case Management Statement and Initial Case Management Conference for two months. WHEREFORE, the Parties jointly request that the Case Management Statement deadline and Initial Case Management Conference be postponed until after August 30, 2018, 9 10 on a date to be set by a future Court Order. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO POSTPONE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 Dated: June 15, 2018 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 By: /s/ Mitchel H. Kider Mitchel H. Kider Jason W. McElroy Joseph M. Katz WEINER BRODSKY KIDER PC 1300 19th Street, N.W. Suite 500 Washington, DC 20036 202-628-2000 Fax: 202-628-2011 Email: kider@thewbkfirm.com Thomas Michael McInerney OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 One Market Plaza San Francisco, CA 94105 415-442-4810 Fax: 415-442-4870 Email: tmm@ogletree.com By: /s/ Jonathan W. Ferris J. Nelson Thomas Michael J. Lingle Jonathan W. Ferris Annette M. Gifford THOMAS & SOLOMON LLP 693 East Avenue Rochester, NY 14607 Telephone: 585-272-0540 Facsimile: 585-272-0574 Sanford Jay Rosen Van Swearingen ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP 50 Fremont Street 19th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Counsel for Relator 17 Counsel for Defendant 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO POSTPONE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 4 5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. GWEN THROWER, 6 7 Plaintiff, 10 [PROPOSED] ORDER TO POSTPONE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 8 9 Case No. 16-CV-02120-EMC ACADEMY MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Defendant. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO POSTPONE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Upon consideration of the parties’ joint request to postpone the Initial Case 1 2 Management Conference; and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 3 stipulation is GRANTED as follows: 4 The Case Management Statement deadline and Initial Case Management Conference 5 are hereby postponed, pending a future Order from this Court. CMC reset for 9/20/18 7 S RT 13 ERED O ORD D IT IS S Honorable IE IF Edward M. Chen S MOD AUnited States District Court NO 12 6/20/18 15 . Chen ward M udge Ed J ER A H 14 R NIA 11 Dated: FO 10 UNIT ED 9 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 8 at 9:30 a.m. Joint CMC statement due 9/13/18. LI 6 N F D IS T IC T O R C 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO POSTPONE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?