Vedanti Systems Limited v. Max Sound Corporation

Filing 41

ORDER Vacating Hearing and Briefing Schedule on 34 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/27/2016. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 VEDANTI SYSTEMS LIMITED, Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 MAX SOUND CORPORATION, Defendant. 11 ORDER VACATING HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Docket No. 34 12 For the Northern District of California United States District Court Case No. 16-cv-02179-EMC Plaintiff has filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against Defendant. In 13 14 essence, Plaintiff seeks equitable relief so that it does not have to participate in an arbitration 15 initiated by Defendant. 16 Plaintiff moved for a preliminary injunction so that it would not have to participate in the 17 arbitration pending a resolution of this action on the merits. On June 10, 2016, the Court granted 18 Plaintiff’s motion. See Docket No. 27 (order). Subsequently, the Clerk of the Court entered 19 Defendant’s default. See Docket No. 32 (notice). Plaintiff then filed its motion for default 20 judgment. Before Defendant’s opposition to that motion was due, Defendant filed a motion to set 21 aside the default. See Docket No. 38 (motion). 22 In light of the above circumstances, the Court hereby orders as follows. 23 1. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment is deferred so that the Court may first 24 address Defendant’s motion to set aside the default. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 2. The hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment, as well as the briefing schedule, is temporarily VACATED. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 Dated: June 27, 2016 ______________________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 9 10 12 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?