Vedanti Systems Limited v. Max Sound Corporation

Filing 64

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 63 OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE filed by Max Sound Corporation. Motions terminated: 38 MOTION to Set Aside Default Entry filed by Max Sound Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/16/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Alfredo A. Bismonte (Cal. Bar. No. 136154)
Jeremy M. Duggan (Cal. Bar. No. 229854)
BECK, BISMONTE & FINLEY, LLP
150 Almaden Blvd, 10th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

11

Brian A. Carpenter (Cal. Bar No. 262349)
Eric W. Buether (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Chris Joe (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
BUETHER JOE & CARPENTER, LLC
1700 Pacific – Suite 4750
Dallas, TX 75201
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

12

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT MAX SOUND CORPORATION

7
8
9
10

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17

VEDANTI SYSTEMS LIMITED,

Case No. 3:16‐cv‐02179‐EMC

18

Plaintiff,

Honorable Edward M. Chen

19

v.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

20
21

MAX SOUND CORPORATION,
Defendant.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02179-EMC

1

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Vedanti Systems Ltd. (“Vedanti”) filed this action against Defendant

2

Max Sound Corporation (“Max Sound”) seeking injunctive relief preventing Max Sound from

3

pursuing claims in arbitration against Vedanti.

4

WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into a written settlement agreement, by which the

5

Parties have settled and disposed of all claims and counterclaims that have or could have been

6

asserted against each other relating to the subject matter of this action.

7

THEREFORE, PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT HEREBY STIPULATE, by and through

8

their respective counsel of record, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41, to dismiss the

9

above-captioned matter with prejudice. This stipulation and dismissal completely terminates the

10

above-entitled action against all parties. Each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

11
12

Dated: December 15, 2016

13
14
15
16
17
18

/s/ Alfredo A. Bismonte
1
Alfredo A. Bismonte (Cal. Bar. No. 136154)
Jeremy M. Duggan (Cal. Bar. No. 229854)
BECK, BISMONTE & FINLEY, LLP
150 Almaden Blvd, 10th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Brian A. Carpenter (Cal. Bar No. 262349)
Eric W. Buether (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Chris Joe (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
BUETHER JOE & CARPENTER, LLC
1700 Pacific – Suite 4750
Dallas, TX 75201
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Attorneys for Defendant Max Sound Corporation

26
27
28

1

As the efiler of this document, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in
filing this document was obtained from all signatories.
1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02179-EMC

1
2
3
4
5
6

Dated: December 15, 2016

/s/ D. Michael Underhill
Beko O. Reblitz-Richardson (SBN 238027)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
1999 Harrison St., Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

11

D. Michael Underhill (admitted pro hac vice)
William C. Jackson (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
5301 Wisconsin Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20015
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

12

Attorneys for Plaintiff Vedanti Systems Limited

7
8
9
10

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02179-EMC

1

ORDER

2

Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore,

3

IT IS ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE,

4

each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. The Clerk of the Court is directed
to vacate all hearings and close the

5

8
9

RT

11

hen

rd M. C

NO

10

ERED
O ORD D
IT IS S
DIFIE
AS MO
dwa
Judge E

H

ER

LI

UNIT
ED

United States District Judge

12
13

R NIA

7

RT
U
O

S DISTRICT
TE
C
A
HON. T
EDWARD M. CHEN

FO

By:

A

Date:

S

6

case.
12/16/2106

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL – CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02179-EMC

C