Schneider et al v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

Filing 46

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 43 Stipulation Selecting Mediation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2016)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Martin Schneider, et al.

CASE No C 3:16-cv-02200-HSG

Plaintiff(s)
v.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
ˆ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
■
ˆ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

ˆ Private ADR (specify process and provider)

Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
ˆ the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,

unless otherwise ordered. )
ˆ other requested deadline: June 30, 2017
■

Date: December 5, 2016
Date: December 5, 2016

/s/ Laurence D. King
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Charles C. Cavanagh
Attorney for Defendant

X
ˆ IT IS SO ORDERED
ˆ IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
Date: 12/14/2016
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order
Selecting Private ADR.”

Form ADR-Stip rev. -2016