Davis v. Metro PCS et al

Filing 15

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 7/27/2016. (jdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

MICHAEL C. DAVIS,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Case No. 16-cv-02212-JD
ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v.
METRO PCS, et al.,
Defendants.

The Court previously dismissed plaintiff’s complaint, and ordered him to file by July 8,

13

2016, an amended complaint that clarifies the basis for the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction over

14

this case. Dkt. No. 10. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint, but instead filed a series of e-

15

mails that had been printed out. Dkt. Nos. 11-13.

16

Even construing the pro se plaintiff’s filings liberally, there is nothing in the filings that

17

establishes federal subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff still has not identified any federal

18

question, nor has he satisfied the bases for diversity jurisdiction. See Dkt. No. 11 at 1 (continuing

19

to demand only $35,000).

20
21
22
23

The Court consequently dismisses this case and orders it closed. The dismissal is without
prejudice. See In re Hall, Bayoutree Assocs., Ltd., 939 F.2d 802, 804 (9th Cir.1991).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 27, 2016

24
25
26
27
28

JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge