Michael Edenborough v. ADT, LLC

Filing 62

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 61 STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Selecting Private ADR by Michael Edenborough filed by Michael Edenborough. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 3, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2016)

Download PDF
Reset Form UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Michael Edenborough CASE No C 16-2233 JST , Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS ADT, LLC , Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) ■ Private ADR (specify process and provider) Private mediation before the Honorable Edward A. Infante (Ret.) of JAMS in San Francisco Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) ■ other requested deadline: January 31, 2017 Date: 11/1/2016 Date: 11/1/2016 /s/ Dan Gildor Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Mark Levine Attorney for Defendant X IT IS SO ORDERED IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Print Form Date: November 3, 2016 U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. -2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?