Michael Edenborough v. ADT, LLC
Filing
90
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 89 STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER re: Stay of Proceedings filed by Michael Edenborough. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 27, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2017)
1
4
CHAVEZ & GERTLER LLP
Mark A. Chavez (CA Bar No. 90858)
Nance F. Becker (CA Bar No. 99292)
42 Miller Avenue
Mill Valley, California 94941
Tel: (415) 381-5599
Fax: (415) 381-5572
5
Additional plaintiff counsel listed on signature page
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff Michael Edenborough and
the Proposed Class
2
3
7
8
9
10
11
SHOOK HARDY & BACON
Randall D. Haimovici (CA Bar No. 213635)
Katherine A. Wolf (CA Bar No. 267763)
One Montgomery St., Suite 2700
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel: (415) 544-1900
Fax: (415) 391-0281
15
BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP
Mark L. Levine (pro hac vice)
Rebecca Weinstein Bacon (pro hac vice)
Daniel R. McElroy (pro hac vice)
54 West Hubbard Street, Suite 300
Chicago, IL 60654
Tel. (312) 494-4400
Fax: (312) 494-4440
16
Attorneys for Defendant ADT LLC
12
13
14
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
21
MICHAEL EDENBOROUGH, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
22
23
24
25
26
Plaintiff,
vs.
ADT, LLC d/b/a ADT SECURITY
SERVICES, INC. a Florida limited liability
company,
Defendant.
27
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No: 16-2233 JST
CLASS ACTION
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STAY OF
PROCEEDINGS
Judge:
Ctrm:
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
9 – 19th Floor
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STAY OF PROCEEDINGS
Case No. 16-2233 JST
1
The Court has considered the parties’ Stipulation Re: Stay of Proceedings and understands
2
that a Settlement Agreement has been signed that would settle all claims asserted herein as part of
3
a national class settlement in Dale Baker v. The ADT Corporation and ADT, LLC d/b/a ADT
4
Security Services, Case No. 15-cv-02038-CSB-DGB (U.S.D.C. C.D. Illinois) (the “Baker Action).
5
Good cause appearing, the Court hereby approves the Stipulation and orders as follows:
6
7
8
9
10
11
1.
This Action and all proceedings herein are stayed pending the approval of the
proposed national class settlement in the Baker Action.
2.
The hearing date for Plaintiff’s pending motion for class certification, the due date
for Plaintiff to file his Reply Brief in support of that motion, and all other dates previously set in
this Action are hereby vacated.
3.
In accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, in the event the Court
12
in the Baker Action does not finally approve the Settlement Agreement or judgment in that case is
13
not entered, any and all rights of the parties existing prior to the execution of the Settlement
14
Agreement, including but not limited to Plaintiffs’ right to seek and ADT’s right to oppose class
15
certification, shall be preserved, and this Action shall proceed in all respects as if the Settlement
16
Agreement had not been entered.
17
18
4.
The parties will submit a report to the Court regarding the status of the Baker
proceedings on July 31, 2017.
19
20
Dated: February 27, 2017
21
________________________________
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
U.S. District Court Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Additional Counsel for Plaintiff:
BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT P.C.
Andrew Friedman (pro hac vice)
Francis J. Balint, Jr. (pro hac vice)
2325 E/ Camelback Rd., Suite 300
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Tel: (602) 274-1100
Fax: (602) 274-1199
(fbalint@bffb.com)
(afriedman@bffb.com)
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STAY OF PROCEEDINGS
Case No. 16-2233 JST
1
2
3
4
ZIMMERMAN LAW OFFICES, P.C.
Tom Zimmerman (pro hac vice)
77 West Washington Street
Suite 1220
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Tel: (312) 440-0020
(Tom@attorneyzim.com)
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STAY OF PROCEEDINGS
Case No. 16-2233 JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?