Chanel, Inc. v. Fu

Filing 46

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 44 (Request to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Chanel, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 9/15/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/22/2016 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/19/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2016)

1

5

KENNETH E. KELLER (SBN 71450) [e-mail]
ETHAN JACOBS (SBN 291838) [e-mail]
KELLER, SLOAN, ROMAN & HOLLAND LLP
555 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiff CHANEL, INC.

7

BRIAN WANG (SBN 245983) [e-mail]
LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN WANG
10008 Langston Street
Rancho Cucamonga. California 91730
Telephone: [phone]

2
3
4

8
9
10
11

Attorneys for Defendant HSIAO YIN FU

12

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

CHANEL, INC., a New York
corporation,

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
HSIAO YIN FU a/k/a NICKY FU
)
a/k/a NICKY HSAIO YIN FU a/k/a
)
HSIAO YINFU a/k/a NICKI HSIAO
)
a/k/a PEER FU, an individual, d/b/a
)
NICKY’S d/b/a NICKY’S
EUROPEAN FASHION, and DOES 1- )
)
10,
)
)
Defendants.

Case No. 3:16-cv-02259-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

25
26
27
28

________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 3:16-cv-02259-EMC

1

Pursuant Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, the parties to this action, Plaintiff Chanel,

2

Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Hsaio Yin Fu (“Defendant”), by and through their attorneys

3

of record, hereby stipulate to the following:

4

On April 27, 2016, the Court entered a Case Management Conference Order that set

5

an initial Case Management Conference for Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. (Dkt. No.

6

22.) On July 18, the Court approved the parties’ joint stipulation and proposed order

7

continuing the Case Management Conference to September 8, 2016. (Dkt. No. 43.)

8

Defendant’s counsel has been out of the country for several months, and recently informed

9

Chanel’s counsel that he will be out of the country on his honeymoon on September 8. (See

10

August 17, 2016 Declaration of Ethan Jacobs (“Jacobs Decl.”), ¶¶ 1-2).

11

Furthermore, the parties anticipate engaging in settlement discussions and scheduling

12

a mediation at some point in the near future. (Id. ¶ 3). Accordingly, the parties respectfully

13

request entry of an Order rescheduling the initial Case Management Conference from

14

Thursday, September 8, 2016 to Thursday, September 22 at 9:30 a.m.

15

There has been one previous time modification in the case, when the Case

16

Management Conference was continued in July at the parties’ request. (Dkt. No. 43.) There

17

are no events scheduled in the case at this time other than the Case Management Conference,

18

so the requested continuance would not affect the schedule for the case.

19

SO STIPULATED:

20

Dated: August 18, 2016

KELLER, SLOAN, ROMAN & HOLLAND, LLP

21

By: ___/s/ Kenneth E. Keller___________________
KENNETH E. KELLER
Attorneys for Plaintiff Chanel, Inc.

22
23
24

Dated: August 18, 2016

LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN WANG

25
26
27
28

By: ___/s/ Brian Wang________________________
BRIAN WANG
Attorneys for Defendant Hsaio Yin Fu
1
________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 3:16-cv-02259-EMC

FILER’S ATTESTATION

1

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory listed, on

2
3
4
5
6
7

whose behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing’s content and has authorized the
filing.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that
the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 18th day of August, 2016 in San Francisco,
California.
By: ___/s/ Kenneth E. Keller___________
KENNETH E. KELLER

8
9
10

ORDER
11

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT

18

ER

20

n

M. Che

A

H

19

R NIA

dward
Judge E

NO

17

FO

16

LI

15

Dated: August __, 2016

RT
U
O

19
14

S

13

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
_________________________________
The Honorable Edward ORChenED
M. DER
T IS SO
United StatesIDistrict Judge

UNIT
ED

12

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
_________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 3:16-cv-02259-EMC