Previvo Genetics, LLC v. Pagidas

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Extending Time for Parties to Meet and Confer and File ADR Certification and Stipulation filed by Kelly Pagidas. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/20/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2016)

Case 3:16-cv-02261-EMC Document 21 Filed 07/07/16 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4

ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
SETH A. NORTHROP, Bar No. (0386933)
[e-mail]
2440 W El Camino Real
Suite 100
Mountain View, CA 94040
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6
7
8

BRETON A. BOCCHIERI, Bar No. (119459)
[e-mail]
2049 Century Park East
Suite 3400
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9

M OUNTAIN V IEW

A TTORNEYS A T L AW

R OBINS K APLAN LLP

10

Attorneys for Defendant
KELLY PAGIDAS

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

PREVIVO GENETICS, LLC,

14

Plaintiff,

15

v.

16

KELLY PAGIDAS,

17

Defendant.

Case No. 3:16-cv-02261
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR EXTENDING TIME FOR
PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER AND
FILE ADR CERTIFICATION AND
STIPULATION
[Civil L.R. 6-1(b)]

18
19

WHEREAS, on July 5, 2016, the Court granted Dr. Pagidas’s Administrative Motion for

20

Relief from the Notice and Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and continued the

21

Case Management Conference until October 27, 2016 and set the deadline for the Joint CMC

22

Statement to be filed by October 20, 2016 (D.I. 20);

23

WHEREAS, the original Case Schedule requires the parties to meet and confer regarding

24

initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan by July 7, 2016

25

(D.I. 6);

26
27

WHEREAS, the original Case Schedule requires the parties to file the ADR Certification
and the Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference by July 7,

28
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENDING TIME FOR PARTIES ….
Case No. 3:16-CV-02261

Case 3:16-cv-02261-EMC Document 21 Filed 07/07/16 Page 2 of 3

1

2016 (D.I. 6);

2

WHEREAS, the parties stipulate to moving the July 7, 2016 dates for meeting and

3

conferring regarding initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery

4

plan and corresponding ADR submission deadlines to October 6, 2016—the same amount of time

5

before the Joint Case Management Conference is due that the Court original set out in the Case

6

Schedule (D.I. 6);

7
8

WHEREAS, this extension of time does not alter the date of any event or any deadline
already fixed by the Court.

9

NOW, THERFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among

M OUNTAIN V IEW

A TTORNEYS A T L AW

R OBINS K APLAN LLP

10

counsel for PREVIVO and PAGIDAS that the deadline for the parties to meet and confer

11

regarding initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan and to

12

file the ADR Certification and the Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone

13

Conference is extended to October 6, 2016

14

.

15
16
17
18

Respectfully submitted,
DATED: July 7, 2016______

ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
By: /s/ Seth A. Northrop ____________________
Seth A. Northrop
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT
KELLY PAGIDAS

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENDING TIME FOR PARTIES ….
Case No. 3:16-CV-02261

Case 3:16-cv-02261-EMC Document 21 Filed 07/07/16 Page 3 of 3

1

DATED: July 7, 2016______________

2

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
By:

/s/ James Huguenin -Love
James Huguenin-Love

3
James Huguenin-Love, Bar No. 301297
500 Arguello Street, Suite 500
Redwood City, California 94063
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

4
5
6
7

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
PREVIVO GENETICS, LLC

8
9

ATTESTATION

11

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest that concurrence in the filing

12

of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

13
Dated: July 7, 2016

/s/ Seth A. Northrop
Seth A. Northrop

14
15
16
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

21

Dated:

July 20, 2016

22

NO

23

Honorable Edward M. Chen
. Chen
Uniteddge Edward M Court Judge
States District
Ju

RT

24

ER

26

A

H

25

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

FO

20

RT
U
O

S

19

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

R NIA

18

LI

17

UNIT
ED

M OUNTAIN V IEW

A TTORNEYS A T L AW

R OBINS K APLAN LLP

10

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

27
28
-3JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENDING TIME FOR PARTIES ….
Case No. 3:16-CV-02261