Previvo Genetics, LLC v. Pagidas
Filing
29
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 28 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or in the Alternative Motion to Transfer to the District of Rhode Island JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PREVIVO TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO PA filed by Previvo Genetics, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/16/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Ahmed J. Davis / davis@fr.com
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Sarah M. Cork / cork@fr.com
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
1425 K Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005-3500
Telephone: (202) 783-5070
Facsimile: (202) 783-2331
James Huguenin-Love (SBN 301297/ huguenin-love@fr.com)
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
500 Arguello Street, Suite 500
Redwood City, California 94063
Telephone: (650) 839-5070
Facsimile: (650) 839-5071
9
10
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PREVIVO GENETICS, LLC
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
Case No. 3:16-cv-02261 EMC
PREVIVO GENETICS, LLC,
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
v.
KELLY PAGIDAS,
Defendant.
Hearing Date: September 22, 2016
Time:
1:30p.m.
Courtroom:
5
Judge:
Honorable Edward M. Chen
19
20
21
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
PREVIVO TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO
PAGIDAS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR
LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION,
OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO
TRANSFER TO THE DISTRICT OF
RHODE ISLAND
WHEREAS, on August 4, 2016, Defendant Kelly Pagidas (“Pagidas”) filed a Motion to
22
Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative Motion to Transfer to the District
23
of Rhode Island (“Motion”) (Dkt. No. 23).
24
25
WHEREAS Plaintiff Previvo Genetics, LLC’s (“Previvo”) Opposition to the Motion is due
on August 18, 2016 making Pagidas’ Reply to Previvo’s Opposition due on August 25, 2016.
26
27
28
JOINT STIP AND PROP’D ORDER FOR AN EXT OF TIME FOR PREVIVO TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO
PAGIDAS MOTION TO DISMISS; MOTION TO TRANSFER
Case No. 3:16-cv-02261-EMC
1
WHEREAS the parties have agreed to extend the deadline for filing Previvo’s Opposition
2
to the Motion to August 25, 2016 and Pagidas’ Reply to Previvo’s Opposition to September 7,
3
2016.
4
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties that Previvo
5
may have an extension of time up to and including August 25, 2016 to file its Opposition to the
6
Motion. Pagidas’ Reply to Previvo’s Opposition will be due on or before September 7, 2016.
7
Dated: August 15, 2016
8
Respectfully submitted,
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
9
By: /s/ James Huguenin-Love
James Huguenin-Love
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PREVIVO GENETICS, LLC
12
13
14
Dated: August 15, 2016
ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
15
By: /s/ David Leichtman
David Leichtman
16
17
Attorneys for Defendant
KELLY PAGIDAS
18
19
20
21
ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest that concurrence in the
22
filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.
23
Dated: August 15, 2016
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
24
25
26
By: /s/ James Huguenin-Love
James Huguenin-Love
27
28
2
JOINT STIP AND PROP’D ORDER FOR AN EXT OF TIME FOR PREVIVO TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO
PAGIDAS MOTION TO DISMISS; MOTION TO TRANSFER
Case No. 3:16-cv-02261-EMC
S
8/16/16
8
R NIA
dwar
Judge E
ER
H
7
RT
6
en
d M. Ch
NO
5
A
4
Honorable Edward M. Chen DERED
O OR
United States DistrictSCourt Judge
IT IS
FO
By:
3
UNIT
ED
Dated:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
LI
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIP AND PROP’D ORDER FOR AN EXT OF TIME FOR PREVIVO TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO
PAGIDAS MOTION TO DISMISS; MOTION TO TRANSFER
Case No. 3:16-cv-02261-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?