Previvo Genetics, LLC v. Pagidas

Filing 31

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 30 23 MOTION to Dismiss. Opposition due: 8/29/16. Reply due 9/8/16. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/24/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Ahmed J. Davis / [e-mail]
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Sarah M. Cork / [e-mail]
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
1425 K Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005-3500
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
James Huguenin-Love (SBN 301297/ [e-mail])
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
500 Arguello Street, Suite 500
Redwood City, California 94063
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9
10

Attorneys for Plaintiff
PREVIVO GENETICS, LLC

11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14

Case No. 3:16-cv-02261 EMC
PREVIVO GENETICS, LLC,

15
16
17
18

Plaintiff,
v.
KELLY PAGIDAS,
Defendant.

Hearing Date: September 22, 2016
Time:
1:30p.m.
Courtroom:
5
Judge:
Honorable Edward M. Chen

19
20
21

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
PREVIVO TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO
PAGIDAS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR
LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION,
OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO
TRANSFER TO THE DISTRICT OF
RHODE ISLAND

WHEREAS, on August 4, 2016, Defendant Kelly Pagidas (“Pagidas”) filed a Motion to

22

Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative Motion to Transfer to the District

23

of Rhode Island (“Motion”) (Dkt. No. 23).

24

WHEREAS Plaintiff Previvo Genetics, LLC’s (“Previvo”) Opposition to the Motion is

25

currently due on August 25, 2016 and Pagidas’ Reply to Previvo’s Opposition due on September

26

7, 2016. (Dkt. No. 29.)

27
28

JOINT STIP AND PROP’D ORDER FOR AN EXT OF TIME FOR PREVIVO TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO
PAGIDAS MOTION TO DISMISS; MOTION TO TRANSFER
Case No. 3:16-cv-02261-EMC

1

WHEREAS the parties have agreed to extend the deadline for filing Previvo’s Opposition

2

to the Motion to September 1, 2016 and Pagidas’ Reply to Previvo’s Opposition to September 14,

3

2016.

4

6

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties that Previvo
August 29, 2016
may have an extension of time up to and including September 1, 2016 to file its Opposition to the
8
Motion. Pagidas’ Reply to Previvo’s Opposition will be due on or before September 14, 2016.

7

Dated: August 23, 2016

5

8

Respectfully submitted,
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

9
By: /s/ James Huguenin-Love
James Huguenin-Love

10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiff
PREVIVO GENETICS, LLC

12
13
14

Dated: August 23, 2016

ROBINS KAPLAN LLP

15
By: /s/ David Leichtman
David Leichtman

16
17

Attorneys for Defendant
KELLY PAGIDAS

18
19
20
21

ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest that concurrence in the

22

filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

23

Dated: August 23, 2016

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

24
25
26

By: /s/ James Huguenin-Love
James Huguenin-Love

27
28

2
JOINT STIP AND PROP’D ORDER FOR AN EXT OF TIME FOR PREVIVO TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO
PAGIDAS MOTION TO DISMISS; MOTION TO TRANSFER
Case No. 3:16-cv-02261-EMC

10

. Chen

ward M
udge Ed

J

ER

H

9

RT

8

NO

7

ERED
O ORD D
IT IS S
DIFIE
AS MO

LI

6

UNIT
ED

5

RT
U
O

4

S DISTRI

CT
E
Honorable Edward M. Chen C
AT
UnitedT
States District Court Judge

S

By:
3

R NIA

Dated:

A

2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. (as modified on p. 2,
lines 5-6.)
8/24/16

FO

1

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
JOINT STIP AND PROP’D ORDER FOR AN EXT OF TIME FOR PREVIVO TO FILE ITS OPPOSITION TO
PAGIDAS MOTION TO DISMISS; MOTION TO TRANSFER
Case No. 3:16-cv-02261-EMC