Cobalt Partners, LP, et al v. SunEdison, Inc. et al

Filing 32

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS OF ATTORNEYS MICHAEL BONGIORNO AND TIMOTHY PERLA 15 16 . (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 COBALT PARTNERS, LP, COBALT PARTNERS II, LP, COBALT OFFSHORE MASTER FUND, LP AND COBALT KC PARTNERS, LP, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATIONS OF ATTORNEYS MICHAEL BONGIORNO AND TIMOTHY PERLA Plaintiffs, 13 No. C 15-03988 WHA v. SUNEDISON, INC., AHMAD CHATILA, BRIAN WUEBBELS, MARTIN TRUONG, ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ, EMMANUEL HERNANDEZ, ANTONIO R. ALVAREZ, PETER BLACKMORE, CLAYTON DALEY JR., GEORGANNE PROCTOR, STEVEN TESORIERE, JAMES B. WILLIAMS, RANDY H. ZWIRN, GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC, MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED, DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC., MACQUARIE CAPITAL (USA), INC., MCS CAPITAL MARKETS LLC and DOES 1- 25, inclusive, Defendants. / The pro hac vice applications of Attorneys Michael Bongiorno and Timothy Perla (Dkt. 26 Nos. 15–16) are DENIED for failing to comply with Civil Local Rule 11–3. The local rule 27 requires that an applicant certify that “he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar 28 of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, 1 specifying such bar” (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court 2 website such that it only identifies the state of bar membership — such as “the bar of Texas” — 3 is inadequate under the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court (such as the 4 Supreme Court of Texas). While the application fees do not need to be paid again, the 5 applications cannot be processed until corrected forms are submitted. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: May 12, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?