Cobalt Partners, LP, et al v. SunEdison, Inc. et al

Filing 99

NOTICE REGARDING POSTPONEMENT OF HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Alsup on 8/4/2016. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 COBALT PARTNERS, LP, COBALT PARTNERS II, LP, COBALT OFFSHORE MASTER FUND, LP AND COBALT KC PARTNERS, LP, Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 v. Related Cases: SUNEDISON, INC., AHMAD CHATILA, BRIAN WUEBBELS, MARTIN TRUONG, ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ, EMMANUEL HERNANDEZ, ANTONIO R. ALVAREZ, PETER BLACKMORE, CLAYTON DALEY JR., GEORGANNE PROCTOR, STEVEN TESORIERE, JAMES B. WILLIAMS, RANDY H. ZWIRN, GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC, MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED, DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC., MACQUARIE CAPITAL (USA), INC., MCS CAPITAL MARKETS LLC and DOES 1- 25, inclusive, Case No. 3:16-cv-02264-WHA Case No. 3:16-cv-02265-WHA Case No. 3:16-cv-02268-WHA NOTICE REGARDING POSTPONEMENT OF HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. / 23 24 No. C 16-02263 WHA AND RELATED CASES. / 25 26 For the benefit of counsel, notice is hereby provided that the hearing on the motion to 27 dismiss in Cobalt Partners, LP, et al. v. SunEdison, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-02263-WHA, 28 has been postponed to a date to be determined after resolution of the pending motion to remand and motion to transfer. 1 2 The hearings on the motions to remand and motions to transfer will take place as scheduled on August 18, 2016, at 8:00 a.m. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: August 4, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?