Cobalt Partners, LP, et al v. SunEdison, Inc. et al
Filing
99
NOTICE REGARDING POSTPONEMENT OF HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Alsup on 8/4/2016. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
COBALT PARTNERS, LP, COBALT
PARTNERS II, LP, COBALT OFFSHORE
MASTER FUND, LP AND COBALT KC
PARTNERS, LP,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
v.
Related Cases:
SUNEDISON, INC., AHMAD CHATILA, BRIAN
WUEBBELS, MARTIN TRUONG, ALEJANDRO
HERNANDEZ, EMMANUEL HERNANDEZ,
ANTONIO R. ALVAREZ, PETER BLACKMORE,
CLAYTON DALEY JR., GEORGANNE
PROCTOR, STEVEN TESORIERE, JAMES B.
WILLIAMS, RANDY H. ZWIRN, GOLDMAN,
SACHS & CO., J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC,
MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC, MERRILL
LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH
INCORPORATED, DEUTSCHE BANK
SECURITIES INC., MACQUARIE CAPITAL
(USA), INC., MCS CAPITAL MARKETS LLC and
DOES 1- 25, inclusive,
Case No. 3:16-cv-02264-WHA
Case No. 3:16-cv-02265-WHA
Case No. 3:16-cv-02268-WHA
NOTICE REGARDING
POSTPONEMENT OF
HEARING ON MOTION
TO DISMISS
Defendants.
/
23
24
No. C 16-02263 WHA
AND RELATED CASES.
/
25
26
For the benefit of counsel, notice is hereby provided that the hearing on the motion to
27
dismiss in Cobalt Partners, LP, et al. v. SunEdison, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-02263-WHA,
28
has been postponed to a date to be determined after resolution of the pending motion to remand
and motion to transfer.
1
2
The hearings on the motions to remand and motions to transfer will take place as
scheduled on August 18, 2016, at 8:00 a.m.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: August 4, 2016.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?