Bloom et al v. SunEdison, Inc. et al
Filing
78
ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE REGARDING CONSOLIDATION OF BLOOM ACTIONS. Signed by Judge Alsup on 9/19/2016. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
No. C 16-02265 WHA
CHARLES BLOOM AND SHARON
BURNSTEIN, Individually and on Behalf of All
Others Similarly Situated ,
14
15
Case No. 16-cv-02263-WHA
Case No. 16-cv-02264-WHA
Case No. 16-cv-02268-WHA
Case No. 16-cv-04883-WHA
Plaintiffs,
13
Related Cases:
v.
SUNEDISON, INC. ET AL.,
16
Defendants.
17
ORDER REQUESTING
RESPONSE REGARDING
CONSOLIDATION OF BLOOM
ACTIONS
AND RELATED CASES.
/
/
18
19
The Court is inclined to consolidate the two Bloom actions for transfer forthwith to the
20
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. BY NOON ON SEPTEMBER
21
21, 2016, counsel for both sides of the Bloom actions should submit an agreed-upon form of
22
order.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: September 19, 2016.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?