Bloom et al v. SunEdison, Inc. et al

Filing 78

ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE REGARDING CONSOLIDATION OF BLOOM ACTIONS. Signed by Judge Alsup on 9/19/2016. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. C 16-02265 WHA CHARLES BLOOM AND SHARON BURNSTEIN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated , 14 15 Case No. 16-cv-02263-WHA Case No. 16-cv-02264-WHA Case No. 16-cv-02268-WHA Case No. 16-cv-04883-WHA Plaintiffs, 13 Related Cases: v. SUNEDISON, INC. ET AL., 16 Defendants. 17 ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE REGARDING CONSOLIDATION OF BLOOM ACTIONS AND RELATED CASES. / / 18 19 The Court is inclined to consolidate the two Bloom actions for transfer forthwith to the 20 United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. BY NOON ON SEPTEMBER 21 21, 2016, counsel for both sides of the Bloom actions should submit an agreed-upon form of 22 order. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 19, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?