Romero et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 33

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANT OLD REPUBLIC'S MOTION TO DISMISS; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The July 22, 2016, hearing on Old Republic's motion to dismiss is vacated. The Case Management Conference is continued from July 29, 2016, to October 21, 2016, at 10:30 a.m. A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than October 14, 2016. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 18, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 EFREN T. ROMERO and JANETH M. ROMERO, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 16-cv-02286-MMC ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANT OLD REPUBLIC'S MOTION TO DISMISS; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE U.S. BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Before the Court is defendant Old Republic Default Management Services' ("Old Republic") "Motion to Dismiss Complaint," filed June 13, 2016. Plaintiff Janeth M. Romero has filed opposition, to which Old Republic has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for determination on the parties’ respective written submissions, and hereby VACATES the hearing scheduled for July 22, 2016. Additionally, in light of the pendency of Old Republic's motion, as well as the pendency of the motion to dismiss filed by defendant U.S. Bank, the Court hereby CONTINUES the Case Management Conference from July 29, 2016, to October 21, 2016, at 10:30 a.m. A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than October 14, 2016. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 18, 2016 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?