Romero et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 48

THIRD ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF JANETH M. ROMERO TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS; ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NO BE IMPOSED. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing and no later than September 28, 2016, why the Court should not impose sanctions on plaintiff and/or her counsel. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 14, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2016)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

EFREN T. ROMERO, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

v.
U.S. BANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 16-cv-02286-MMC
THIRD ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF
JANETH M. ROMERO TO SUBMIT
CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE
WITH THE CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND
THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS;
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS
SHOULD NO BE IMPOSED

12
13
14

On September 8, 2016, plaintiff Janeth M. Romero electronically filed two

15

documents: (1) opposition to defendant U.S. Bank, N.A.'s motion to dismiss and request

16

for judicial notice; and (2) opposition to defendant Old Republic National Title Insurance

17

Company's motion to dismiss and request for judicial notice. In each instance, plaintiff

18

has violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court’s Standing Orders,

19

however, by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is

20

electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also

21

Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

22

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the

23

Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-

24

referenced documents.

25

The Court has previously advised plaintiff, twice, of her failure to comply with the

26

Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court's Standing Orders in connection with

27

earlier-filed documents. (See Order, filed May 26, 2016; Order, filed August 22, 2016.)

28

Said reminders appear to have had no effect on compelling compliance therewith.

1

Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing and no

2

later than September 28, 2016, why the Court should not impose sanctions on plaintiff

3

and/or her counsel.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: September 14, 2016
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2