Romero et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 53

ORDER VACATING HEARINGS ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 26, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

EFREN T. ROMERO and JANETH M.
ROMERO,

12

Plaintiffs,

13
14

v.

Case No. 16-cv-02286-MMC
ORDER VACATING HEARINGS ON
DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS

U.S. BANK, N.A., et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Before the Court are two motions: (1) defendant Old Republic National Title

18

Insurance Company's ("Old Republic") "Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint,"

19

filed August 25, 2016, and noticed for hearing on September 30, 2016; and (2) defendant

20

U.S. Bank National Association's ("U.S. Bank") "Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First

21

Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim," filed August 25, 2016, and noticed for

22

hearing on October 14, 2016. Plaintiff Janeth M. Romero has filed opposition to each

23

motion,1 to which Old Republic and U.S. Bank have separately replied.

24
25

Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the
motions, the Court deems the matters suitable for decision on the parties' respective

26
27
28

1

As set forth in the Court's order of July 20, 2016, plaintiff Efren T. Romero is
deceased.

1

written submissions, and hereby VACATES the hearings scheduled for, respectively,

2

September 30, 2016, 2 and October 14, 2016.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated: September 26, 2016
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

In light thereof, the separate motions by Old Republic and Janeth M. Romero for
leave to telephonically appear on September 30, 2016, are hereby DENIED as moot. For
future reference, the parties are advised that the Court does not conduct hearings on
contested motions by telephone.
2