Doe v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Jane Doe filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 24, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2016)

Download PDF
Reset Form UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JANE DOE , CASE No C 3:16-CV-2298 JST Plaintiff(s) v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) x Private ADR (specify process and provider) ADR provider to be determined. Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: x the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) other requested deadline: Date: August 24, 2016 /s/ James P. Keenley Attorney for Plaintiff Date: August 24, 2016 /s/ Peter J. Felsenfeld Attorney for Defendant Print Form X IT IS SO ORDERED IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: August 24, 2016 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE HON. JON S. TIGAR Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. -2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?