McCarthy v. Nash et al

Filing 11

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 11/4/2016. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 10/25/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ROBERT MCCARTHY, Case No. 16-cv-02312-HSG Plaintiff, 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. Re: Dkt. No. 10 9 10 LITTIE B. NASH, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 On April 27, 2016, Plaintiff Robert McCarthy filed this action against Defendants Trustee 13 14 Littie B. Nash, Cappo Management XXVIII, and Joe Shaghasi, asserting violation of (1) the 15 Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and (2) California accessibility laws. Dkt. No. 1. On 16 April 28, 2016, the Court entered the standard scheduling order for cases asserting denial of right 17 of access under the ADA. Dkt. No. 4. 18 Under the scheduling order, the last day for Plaintiff to file a “Notice of Need for 19 Mediation” was September 21, 2016. Id. Plaintiff failed to file any notice, and on October 18, 20 2016, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why he did not file a “Notice of Need for 21 Mediation” by the Court’s deadline. Dkt. No. 10. The order to show cause directed Plaintiff to 22 file a short statement of no more than two pages explaining the status of this action by October 21, 23 2016. Id. Plaintiff’s deadline to file a status report has passed, and Plaintiff has again failed to 24 comply with the Court’s deadline. 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why the Court should not dismiss this 1 2 action for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff shall respond to this Order in a written statement of no 3 more than two pages by November 4, 2016. If Plaintiff fails to respond to this Order, the Court 4 will dismiss the action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 Dated: 10/25/2016 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?