Stevick et al v. Monsanto Company

Filing 34

RULE 502(d) ORDER. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 7/1/2016. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ELAINE STEVICK and
CHRISTOPHER STEVICK,

14

RULE 502(d) ORDER

Plaintiffs,

12
13

Case No.: 3:16-cv-02341-VC

v.
MONSANTO COMPANY,
Defendant.

15
16
17
18

1.

The production of privileged or work-product protected documents, electronically

19

stored information (“ESI”) or information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of

20

the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding.

21

This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Evidence 502(d).
2.

Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party’s right to

conduct a review of documents, ESI or information (including metadata) for relevance,
responsiveness, and/or segregation of privileged and/or protected information before production.
Date: _________________, 2016
July 1
_____________________________________
HONORABLE VINCE CHHABRIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-1[PROPOSED] RULE 502(d) ORDER
3:16-cv-02341-VC