Harrison v. Colvin
Filing
51
ORDER regarding 49 Request for Attorneys' Fees. Plaintiff's counsel shall file proof of service as stated herein no later than March 18, 2019. Plaintiff may file a response no later than April 1, 2019. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2019)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MERCEDES M. HARRISON,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 16-cv-02371-JCS
ORDER REGARDING REQUEST FOR
ATTORNEYS’ FEES
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Re: Dkt. No. 49
Defendant.
12
13
Plaintiff Mercedes Harrison’s counsel Josephine Gerrard filed a proposed order awarding
14
fees in the amount of $23,700 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) and Plaintiff’s contingent fee
15
agreement. Dkt. 49. Defendant Nancy Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the
16
“Commissioner”), filed a response taking no position on the request but providing additional
17
background on applicable rules. The Court tentatively finds the amount of the request, which is
18
significantly below the maximum amount authorized under § 406(b), to be reasonable and well-
19
founded. However, the request is deficient in two respects.
20
First, counsel did not file a motion as required by this Court’s local rules. See Civ. L.R.
21
7-1(a) (“Any written request to the Court for an order must be presented by one of the following
22
means . . . .”). To avoid unnecessary and duplicative effort, the Court in this instance excuses that
23
requirement and deems the proposed order to be a motion, but counsel is admonished to comply
24
with applicable rules going forward, including in other cases.
25
Second, and more importantly, there is no indication that Harrison herself was served with
26
counsel’s request or given an opportunity to object. Counsel is instructed to serve a copy of
27
(1) her proposed order, (2) the Commissioner’s response, and (3) this order on Harrison, by any
28
means reasonably calculated to provide actual notice, and to file proof of service to that effect no
1
later than March 18, 2019. If Harrison opposes her attorney’s request for fees, she may file a
2
response no later than April 1, 2019.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 11, 2019
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
Chief Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?