Harrison v. Colvin

Filing 51

ORDER regarding 49 Request for Attorneys' Fees. Plaintiff's counsel shall file proof of service as stated herein no later than March 18, 2019. Plaintiff may file a response no later than April 1, 2019. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MERCEDES M. HARRISON, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 16-cv-02371-JCS ORDER REGARDING REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Re: Dkt. No. 49 Defendant. 12 13 Plaintiff Mercedes Harrison’s counsel Josephine Gerrard filed a proposed order awarding 14 fees in the amount of $23,700 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) and Plaintiff’s contingent fee 15 agreement. Dkt. 49. Defendant Nancy Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the 16 “Commissioner”), filed a response taking no position on the request but providing additional 17 background on applicable rules. The Court tentatively finds the amount of the request, which is 18 significantly below the maximum amount authorized under § 406(b), to be reasonable and well- 19 founded. However, the request is deficient in two respects. 20 First, counsel did not file a motion as required by this Court’s local rules. See Civ. L.R. 21 7-1(a) (“Any written request to the Court for an order must be presented by one of the following 22 means . . . .”). To avoid unnecessary and duplicative effort, the Court in this instance excuses that 23 requirement and deems the proposed order to be a motion, but counsel is admonished to comply 24 with applicable rules going forward, including in other cases. 25 Second, and more importantly, there is no indication that Harrison herself was served with 26 counsel’s request or given an opportunity to object. Counsel is instructed to serve a copy of 27 (1) her proposed order, (2) the Commissioner’s response, and (3) this order on Harrison, by any 28 means reasonably calculated to provide actual notice, and to file proof of service to that effect no 1 later than March 18, 2019. If Harrison opposes her attorney’s request for fees, she may file a 2 response no later than April 1, 2019. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 11, 2019 ______________________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO Chief Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?