Harrison v. Colvin
Filing
53
Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting 49 Motion for Attorneys' Fees. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2019)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MERCEDES M. HARRISON,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Case No. 16-cv-02371-JCS
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
ATTORNEYS’ FEES
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Re: Dkt. No. 49
Defendant.
Plaintiff’s counsel moves for attorneys’ fees totaling $29,700 pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
13
§ 406(b)(1)(A). Dkt. 49. The Court previously ordered counsel to serve her motion on Plaintiff
14
Mercedes Harrison, to allow Harrison an opportunity to be heard if she objected to the request.
15
Dkt. 51. Counsel has filed proof of service (dkt. 52), the deadline for an objection has passed, and
16
Harrison has not filed an objection. For the reason’s stated in counsel’s motion, Defendant Nancy
17
Berryhill’s non-opposition response (dkt. 50), and the Court’s previous order, the Court finds
18
counsel’s request for fees to be permissible and warranted under § 406(b)(1)(A) and Harrison’s fee
19
agreement. After offsetting the $6,000 previously awarded pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice
20
Act, counsel is entitled to $23,700. Defendant shall provide that sum to counsel and provide any
21
further benefits that have been withheld pending resolution of this issue to Harrison.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 8, 2019
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
Chief Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?