Gillespie et al v. Prestige Royal Liquors Corp. et al
Filing
27
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 22 Stipulation Extend Time to Respond. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
HSG
Case No. 16-cv-02392-JSC
Hon. Jacqueline Scott Corley
ELLIOTT GILLESPIE, an individual;
ROCKWOOD SPIRITS
INTERNATIONAL, a Canadian
corporation,
[PROPOSED] ORDER
GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME TO RESPOND
TO COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs,
v.
Date: Not Set For Hearing
Time: Not Set For Hearing
Courtroom: Not Set for Hearing
PRESTIGE ROYAL LIQUORS, CORP., a
New York corporation; GABRIEL
SEZANAYEV a/k/a Gavriyel Sezanayev, an
individual; FUSION GLASSWORKS, LLC, a
Florida corporation; and PRIVATE LABEL
DISTILLERY, LLC, a Colorado corporation;
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive.
Defendants.
14
15
On June 30, 2016, Plaintiffs Elliott Gillespie and Rockwood Spirits International
16
(“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Private Label Distillery, LLC and Fusion Glassworks, LLC
17
(collectively, “Defendants”) filed with this Court a stipulation to extend the time for Private
18
Label Distillery and Fusion Glassworks to answer the Complaint or to otherwise plead.
19
20
21
Having reviewed and considered the stipulation, the pleadings and files in this case, the
Court rules as follows:
The parties have shown good cause for the requested extension of time. Therefore, the
22
Court GRANTS the parties’ request and the new deadline for Defendants Private Label Distillery
23
and Fusion Glassworks to answer the Complaint or to otherwise plead as permitted under the
24
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is July 25, 2016.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
July 5, 2016
Dated: June _____, 2016
-127586/00401/SF/5567209.2
1
2
3
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Hon. Jacqueline Scott Corley
United States District District Court Judge
United States Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-227586/00401/SF/5567209.2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?