Hoffman v. Intrexon Corporation et al
Filing
36
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg denying 19 Motion to Consolidate Cases; denying 23 Motion to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel ; denying 23 Motion to Consolidate Cases; granting 27 Motion to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel ; granting 27 Motion to Consolidate Cases. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2016)
6
Lionel Z. Glancy (SBN 134180)
Robert V. Prongay (SBN 270796)
Casey E. Sadler (SBN 274241)
Lesley F. Portnoy (SBN 304851)
GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: (310) 201-9150
Facsimile: (310) 201-9160
Email: info@glancylaw.com
7
Proposed Lead Counsel for Movant and the Class
1
2
3
4
5
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
RYAN HOFFMAN, Individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
v.
INTREXON CORPORATION, RANDAL J.
KIRK, and RICK L. STERLING,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
PATRICK M. and DEBORAH P. GIBRALL,
Individually and on Behalf of All Others
Similarly Situated,
Plaintiffs,
21
22
23
24
25
v.
INTREXON CORPORATION, RANDAL J.
KIRK, and RICK L. STERLING,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:16-cv-02398-RS
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING
THE RELATED CASES, APPOINTING
LEAD PLAINTIFF AND APPROVING
SELECTION OF COUNSEL AS MODIFIED
BY COURT
CLASS ACTION
JUDGE: Hon. Richard Seeborg
DATE:
August 11, 2016
TIME:
1:30 P.M.
CTRM: 3 – 17th Floor
) Case No. 3:16-cv-02457-RS
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
26
27
28
29
30
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING THE RELATED CASES, APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFF AND
APPROVING SELECTION OF COUNSEL AS MODIFIED BY COURT
Case No. 3:16-cv-02398-RS
1
2
Having considered Joe Seppen’s motion for consolidation of the related cases, appointment as
lead plaintiff, and approval of his selection of counsel (the “Motion”), Dkt. No. 27, the statements of
non-opposition to that motion, Dkt Nos. 32, 34, and the good cause appearing therefor,
3
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
5
1)
The Motion is GRANTED;
6
2)
The above-captioned actions are CONSOLIDATED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
7
Procedure 42(a) as In re Intrexon Corporation Securities Litigation, Master File No. 3:16-cv-02398-
8
RS;
9
10
11
12
3)
The Court, having considered the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. §78u-4(a)(3)(B), appoints Joe Seppen as Lead Plaintiff;
4)
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v), Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP is approved
as Lead Counsel for the class; and
5)
The motions set for August 11, 2016, see Dkt. Nos. 19, 23, 27, are suitable for
13
disposition without oral argument, and the hearing will be vacated. Civ. Local Rule 7-
14
1(b).
15
16
SO ORDERED.
17
18
19
20
21
Dated: ______July 25_____, 2016
__________________________________________
THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
29
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING THE RELATED CASES, APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFF AND
APPROVING SELECTION OF COUNSEL AS MODIFIED BY COURT
Case No. 3:16-cv-02398-RS
30
31
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?