Hoffman v. Intrexon Corporation et al

Filing 52

STIPULATION AND ORDER Continuing Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/6/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

NINA F. LOCKER, State Bar No. 123838
Email: [e-mail]
JEROME F. BIRN, JR., State Bar No. 128561
Email: [e-mail]
JONI OSTLER, State Bar No. 230009
Email: [e-mail]
NICHOLAS R. MILLER, State Bar No. 274243
Email: [e-mail]
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8
9

Attorneys for Defendants Intrexon Corporation,
Randal J. Kirk, Rick L. Sterling, and Krish S. Krishnan

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15

In re Intrexon Corporation Securities Litigation

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
HEARING ON DEFS’ MOT. TO DISMISS
CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-02398-RS

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-02398-RS
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS

1

Defendants Intrexon Corporation, Randal J. Kirk, Rick L. Sterling, and Krish S. Krishnan

2

(collectively, “Defendants”), and Lead Plaintiff Joe Seppen, by and through their attorneys,

3

stipulate and agree as follows:

4

WHEREAS, on August 2, 2016, based on a stipulation by and among the parties, the Court

5

entered an Order Regarding Deadline for Filing Consolidated Amended Complaint and Briefing

6

Schedule for Anticipated Motion(s) to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 41) setting forth a schedule requiring

7

that Plaintiff file its consolidated amended complaint by September 22, 2016, that Defendants

8

answer or otherwise respond by November 17, 2016, that Plaintiff file its opposition to that motion

9

by December 23, 2016, and that Defendants file their reply by February 2, 2017;

10
11
12
13
14
15

WHEREAS, Defendants thereafter timely filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint
in this action (Dkt. No. 46) (“Motion to Dismiss”) on November 17, 2016;
WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is currently noticed for
February 16, 2017;
WHEREAS, Defendants’ counsel subsequently learned of a scheduling conflict and cannot
attend a hearing on February 16, 2017;

16

WHEREAS, Defendants informed Lead Plaintiff of this scheduling conflict and the parties

17

agreed to request that the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss be continued for one week to

18

Monday, February 23, 2017.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the
respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that:
1.

The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be continued from February

16, 2017 to February 23, 2017.
2.

All briefing deadlines with respect to the Motion to Dismiss shall remain as set

forth in the Scheduling Order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
HEARING ON DEFS’ MOT. TO DISMISS
CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-02398-RS

-1-

1

DATED: January 6, 2017

2

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
By: /s/ Joni Ostler
Joni Ostler

3
4

650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5
6
7

Attorneys for Defendants Intrexon Corporation,
Randal J. Kirk, Rick L. Sterling, and Krish S.
Krishnan

8
9
10

DATED: January 6, 2017

11

GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP
By: /s/ Joshua L. Crowell
Joshua L. Crowell

12

15

1925 Century Park East
Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310-201-9160
Email: [e-mail]

16

Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff Joe Seppen

13
14

17
[PROPOSED] ORDER

18
19

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, it is hereby ordered that:

20

1.

21
22
23
24

The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be continued from February

16, 2017 to February 23, 2017.
2.

All briefing deadlines with respect to the Motion to Dismiss shall remain as set

forth in the Scheduling Order.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

DATED: ________________
1/6/17

27

__________________________________________
HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
HEARING ON DEFS’ MOT. TO DISMISS
CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-02398-RS

-2-