Ultratech, Inc. v. Analog Devices, Inc.

Filing 37

ORDER granting 36 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Hearing Date filed by Analog Devices, Inc. Reset Hearing as to 16 MOTION Enforce Settlement Agreement , 12 MOTION to Enforce Settlement Agreement, Dis miss the Complaint, and Award Attorney's Fees . Motion Hearing reset for 7/22/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/12/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2016)

Download PDF
1 5 L. Scott Oliver (SBN 174824) Audrey Lo (SBN 253738) K&L Gates LLP 630 Hansen Way Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 798-6700 Facsimile: (650) 798-6701 scott.oliver@klgates.com audrey.lo@klgates.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Ultratech, Inc. 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Colin G. Cabral (State Bar No. 296913) ccabral@proskauer.com PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 2049 Century Park East, 32nd Floor Los Angeles, California 90067-3206 Telephone: (310) 557-2900 Facsimile: (310) 557-2193 Steven M. Bauer (pro hac vice application pending) sbauer@proskauer.com Brendan S. Cox (pro hac vice application pending) bcox@proskauer.com PROSKAUER ROSE LLP One International Place Boston, Massachusetts 02110 Telephone: (617) 526-9600 Facsimile: (617) 526-9899 Attorneys for Defendant Analog Devices, Inc. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 21 22 23 24 25 26 Case No. 3:16-cv-02409-CRB ULTRATECH, INC., vs. Plaintiff, ANALOG DEVICES, INC., Hon. Charles R. Breyer STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE (L.R. 6-2) Defendant. 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE 3:16-cv-02409-CRB 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Ultratech, Inc. (“Ultratech”) and 2 Defendant Analog Devices, Inc. (“ADI”) (collectively, the “Parties”) submit this 3 stipulation to continue the hearing date on the Parties’ respective Motions to Enforce 4 Settlement Agreement from July 15, 2016 to July 22, 2016. 5 6 WHEREAS, Ultratech filed the Complaint in this action on May 3, 2016 in the Northern District of California; 7 WHEREAS, the Parties executed a settlement agreement on May 20, 2016; 8 WHEREAS, ADI filed a Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement, Dismiss 9 10 11 the Complaint, and Award Attorney’s Fees on June 7, 2016 (Dkt. 12); WHEREAS, Ultratech filed a Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement on June 8, 2016 (Dkt. 16); 12 WHEREAS, the hearing on both ADI’s Motion to Enforce Settlement 13 Agreement, Dismiss the Complaint, and Award Attorney’s Fees and Ultratech’s 14 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement is currently noticed and scheduled for July 15 15, 2016; 16 WHEREAS, counsel for ADI now has conflicts with the July 15, 2016 hearing 17 date, including a concurrent trial in the Southern District of New York and binding 18 personal obligations; 19 20 WHEREAS, Ultratech and ADI have mutually agreed to continue the hearing date on the Parties’ motions to July 22, 2016, and 21 WHEREAS, there have been no previous time modifications relating to this 22 hearing, and the requested time modification would not affect the remaining schedule 23 for this case; 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE 3:16-cv-02409-CRB 1 NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated that the hearing date on the 2 Parties’ respective Motions to Enforce Settlement Agreement shall be continued from 3 July 15, 2016 to July 22, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. 4 5 DATED: July 11, 2016 6 K&L Gates LLP L. Scott Oliver Audrey Lo 7 8 By: /s/ L. Scott Oliver L. Scott Oliver 9 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff Ultratech, Inc. 11 12 DATED: July 11, 2016 13 14 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP Colin G. Cabral Steven M. Bauer Brendan S. Cox 15 16 17 By: /s/ Colin Cabral Colin Cabral 18 Attorneys for Defendant Analog Devices, Inc. 19 20 21 I hereby attest that I obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from each of the other signatories on this e-filed document. 22 23 24 DATED: July 11, 2016 By: /s/ Colin Cabral Colin Cabral 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE 3:16-cv-02409-CRB 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, 2 3 4 5 6 DATED: July 12, 2016 _________________________________________ Honorable Charles R. Breyer United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE 3:16-cv-02409-CRB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?