Morales et al v. County of Mendocino et al

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend County Defendants' Time to File Responsive Pleading. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 09/14/2016. (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2016)

Download PDF
1 5 ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. CSB# 159747 SARAH E. MARINHO, ESQ. CSB#293690 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT R. POWELL 925 West Hedding Street San Jose, California 95126 T: (408) 553-0200 F: (408) 553-0203 E: rpowell@rrpassociates.com 6 Attorney for Plaintiffs 2 3 4 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 LINDA MORALES, et al., 11 12 Plaintiffs, STIPULATION TO EXTEND COUNTY DEFENDANTS’ TIME FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING vs. 13 14 15 Case No.: 16-CV-02429-EMC COUNTY OF MENDOCINO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, Plaintiffs Linda 18 19 Morales, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for minor K.B., and Rudolfo Morales 20 (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants County of Mendocino, Janee Dale, Lisa Allison, Robin 21 Buxton, Buffey Wright, Jennifer Sookne, Mimi Cabral, and Susan Rogers (“County 22 Defendants”) through their respective attorneys as follows: 23 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on May 4, 2016; 24 WHEREAS, County Defendants were sent a Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to 25 Waive Service of Summons on June 17, 2016; 1 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Stipulation to Extend Defendants’ Time for Filing Responsive Pleading Morales v. County of Mendocino, et al. U.S. District Court – Northern District Case No. 16-CV-02429-EMC 1 2 WHEREAS, County Defendants agreed to waive service of summons, and their responsive pleadings were due on August 16, 2016; 3 4 WHEREAS, County Defendants required additional time to prepare and file their responsive pleadings; 5 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs are willing to provide additional time for County Defendants 6 to prepare and file their responsive pleadings; 7 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs granted County Defendants additional time to prepare and file 8 9 responsive pleadings to September 16, 2016. 10 11 NOW, THEREFORE, BASED ON THE FOREGOING RECITALS, THE PARTIES 12 HEREBY STIPULATE THAT: 13 1. County Defendants’ deadline to file their pleadings in response to the Complaint on file 14 in this matter is September 16, 2016. 15 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 17 18 DATED: September 13, 2016 LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT R. POWELL 19 R NIA ward M udge Ed FO RT J ER H 25 . Chen NO 24 DATED: September 13, 2016 LI 23 VED APPRO A 22 UNIT ED 21 S DISTRICT TE C TA 09/14/2016 RT U O S 20 __/S/Robert R. Powell________________ ROBERT R. POWELL Attorneys for Plaintiffs MITCHELL, BRISSO, DELANEY & VRIEZE __/S/Nancy Delaney__________________ NANCY DELANEY Attorneys for Defendants C F D IS T IC T O R 2 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ N Stipulation to Extend Defendants’ Time for Filing Responsive Pleading Morales v. County of Mendocino, et al. U.S. District Court – Northern District Case No. 16-CV-02429-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?