Miller v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) et al
Filing
180
ORDER granting 177 Stipulation For Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/9/2019. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2019)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California
WILLIAM C. KWONG
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
ANNE E. WADDELL
Deputy Attorney General
ALLISON M. LOW
Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 273202
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: (415) 510-3589
Fax: (415) 703-5480
E-mail: Allison.Low@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation, Ahmed, Bright, DeLuna, Hall, and
Posson
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
15
CHARLES A. MILLER,
Case No. 3:16-cv-02431 EMC
16
Plaintiff,
17
STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
(Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))
v.
18
19
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
20
Defendants.
21
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
26
27
28
1
Stip. Voluntary Dismissal (3:16-cv-02431 EMC)
1
Plaintiff Charles A. Miller (CDCR No. P-11107) and Defendants have resolved this case in
2
its entirety. Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under
3
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(ii).
4
Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney's fees.
5
It is so stipulated.
6
7
Dated:
8
X
9
10
Dated: - - - - - - - -
By:
m_
.
---~~-,-------------H.F.~n
/1/"1
H.F
ton Law Officl r t , ~
Couns -fcri1Plaintiff (for a limited phfpose)
11
12
13
14
Dated:
°J /4.. (~
15
19
SF2016400413
21602795.docx
TED
GRAN
20
NO
RT
ER
Dated: 9/9/2019
A
H
22
Chen
LI
21
23
ard M.
dw
Judge E
R NIA
S
UNIT
ED
18
RT
U
O
17
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
FO
16
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stip. Voluntary Dismissal (3 :16-cv-02431 EMC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?