Miller v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) et al

Filing 180

ORDER granting 177 Stipulation For Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/9/2019. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California WILLIAM C. KWONG Supervising Deputy Attorney General ANNE E. WADDELL Deputy Attorney General ALLISON M. LOW Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 273202 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 510-3589 Fax: (415) 703-5480 E-mail: Allison.Low@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Ahmed, Bright, DeLuna, Hall, and Posson 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 15 CHARLES A. MILLER, Case No. 3:16-cv-02431 EMC 16 Plaintiff, 17 STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) v. 18 19 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., 20 Defendants. 21 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 26 27 28 1 Stip. Voluntary Dismissal (3:16-cv-02431 EMC) 1 Plaintiff Charles A. Miller (CDCR No. P-11107) and Defendants have resolved this case in 2 its entirety. Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under 3 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(ii). 4 Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney's fees. 5 It is so stipulated. 6 7 Dated: 8 X 9 10 Dated: - - - - - - - - By: m_ . ---~~-,-------------H.F.~n /1/"1 H.F ton Law Officl r t , ~ Couns -fcri1Plaintiff (for a limited phfpose) 11 12 13 14 Dated: °J /4.. (~ 15 19 SF2016400413 21602795.docx TED GRAN 20 NO RT ER Dated: 9/9/2019 A H 22 Chen LI 21 23 ard M. dw Judge E R NIA S UNIT ED 18 RT U O 17 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 16 N F D IS T IC T O R C 24 25 26 27 28 2 Stip. Voluntary Dismissal (3 :16-cv-02431 EMC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?