Atilano v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Filing
4
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-37). CASE TRANSFERRED to the Nothern District of California. MDL No. 2672. (Robles, S)
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1476 Filed 05/02/16 Page 13 3
Case MDL No. 2672 Document 1568 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of of
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: VOLKSWAGEN "CLEAN DIESEL"
MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
MDL No. 2672
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −37)
On December 8, 2015, the Panel transferred 56 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for
the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1407. See __F.Supp.3d__ (J.P.M.L. 2015). Since that time, 612 additional action(s)
have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such
actions have been assigned to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to
Judge Breyer.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of December 8, 2015, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall
be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
May 02, 2016
FOR THE PANEL:
Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel
I hereby certify that the annexed
instrument is a true and correct copy
of the original on file in my office.
ATTEST:
SUSAN Y. SOONG
Clerk, U.S. District Court
Northern District of California
by:
Date:
Deputy Clerk
02 May 2016
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1476 Filed 05/02/16 Page 23 3
Case MDL No. 2672 Document 1568 Filed 05/02/16 Page 2 of of
IN RE: VOLKSWAGEN "CLEAN DIESEL"
MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
MDL No. 2672
SCHEDULE CTO−37 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS
DIST
DIV.
C.A.NO.
CASE CAPTION
2
16−01062
Allen et al v. Volkswagen Group of America
Incorporated
ARIZONA
AZ
CALIFORNIA CENTRAL
CAC
2
16−02637
Joyce Ann Zigrand Davis v. Volkswagen Group of
America, Inc., et al
CALIFORNIA EASTERN
CAE
1
16−00548
Atilano v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
16−00101
Corbin et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
1
1
3
16−04268
16−04281
16−50102
Gonzalez v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
Glick et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Dittbenner et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
1
16−01118
Allen et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
16−30066
Serra et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
GEORGIA NORTHERN
GAN
4
ILLINOIS NORTHERN
ILN
ILN
ILN
MARYLAND
MD
MASSACHUSETTS
MA
3
PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN
PAW
2
16−00432
PAW
2
16−00436
PANDOLPH v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF
AMERICA, INC.
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1476 Filed 05/02/16 Page 33 3
Case MDL No. 2672 Document 1568 Filed 05/02/16 Page 3 of of
PAW
2
16−00439
PAW
2
16−00440
PAW
2
16−00441
PAW
2
16−00447
PAW
2
16−00448
VALETICH v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF
AMERICA, INC
MALLORY v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF
AMERICA, INC.
STEINER v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA,
INC.
DAVIES v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA,
INC.
LUNDQUIST v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF
AMERICA, INC
BROWN v. VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA,
INC
16−00752
Clark et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
TENNESSEE MIDDLE
TNM
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?