LoganTree LP v. FitBit Inc.

Filing 74

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 73 to vacate scheduling order and stay proceedings. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/12/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 H. Arnold Shokouhi (CA Bar No. 284144) arnolds@mccathernlaw.com Everett S. Hinchcliffe (Ca Bar No. 61508) ehinchcliffe@mccathernlaw.com MCCATHERN, PLLC 3710 Rawlins, Suite 1600 Dallas, Texas 75219 Telephone: 214.741.2662 Facsimile: 214.741.4717 10 William H. Mandir (pro hac vice) wmandir@sughrue.com Chandran Iyer (pro hac vice) cbiyer@sughrue.com SUGHRUE MION, PLLC 2100 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W. Washington, DC 20037 Telephone: 202.293.7060 Facsimile: 202.293.7860 11 Counsel for Plaintiff LoganTree, LP 7 8 9 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 LOGANTREE LP, Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Civil Action No. 16-cv-02443-RS v. FITBIT INC. Defendant. STIPULATED REQUEST TO VACATE SCHEDULING ORDER AND STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 WHEREAS on October 2, 2015, Plaintiff Logantree L.P. (“Logantree”) filed this case in the 2 United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas seeking damages, injunctive, and other 3 relief, and alleging that Defendant Fitbit Inc. (“Fitbit”) directly or indirectly infringed U.S. Patent 4 No. 6,059,576 (“‘576 patent”); 5 WHEREAS on March 18, 2016, Fitbit filed its Counterclaims and Answer to Logantree’s 6 Complaint asserting counterclaims of non-infringement and invalidity for each of the asserted patent; 7 WHEREAS on May 6, 2016, Judge Rodney Gilstrap of the United States District Court for 8 the Eastern District of Texas granted Fitbit’s motion to transfer this litigation to the Northern District 9 of California; 10 11 WHEREAS on August 4, 2016, this Court entered a Case Management Scheduling Order [Docket No. 61] in this case; 12 WHEREAS Fitbit filed petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”) of the ‘576 patent with the 13 Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office on 14 November 11, 2016 (IPR2017-00256) and November 12, 2016 (IPR2017-00258); 15 WHEREAS Plaintiff and Defendant settled this matter on November 16, 2016; 16 WHEREAS pursuant to the parties’ settlement, the parties have agreed to dismiss this action 17 18 19 20 21 with prejudice and to terminate IPR proceedings before the PTAB; WHEREAS on December 13, 2016, the parties jointly requested authorization from the PTAB to file papers terminating the IPR; WHEREAS the parties are awaiting assignment of a PTAB panel to FitBit’s IPR in order to file papers terminating the IPR; 22 THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiff and Defendant, through their 23 designated counsel, that the Case Management and Scheduling Order should be vacated and that all 24 proceedings in this action should be stayed until such time as the parties are able to dismiss this 25 action and to terminate the IPR pursuant to the terms of their settlement. 26 Dated: January 11, 2017 27 28 /s/ H. Arnold Shokouhi MCCATHERN, PLLC H. Arnold Shokouhi (CA Bar No. 284144) arnolds@mccathernlaw.com Everett S. Hinchcliffe (CA Bar No. 61508) STIPULATED REQUEST TO VACATE SCHEDULING ORDER AND STAY PROCEEDINGS 2 1 ehinchcliffe@mccathernlaw.com 3710 Rawlins, Suite 1600 Dallas, Texas 75219 Telephone: 214.741.2662 Facsimile: 214.741.4717 2 3 4 8 SUGHRUE MION, PLLC William H. Mandir (pro hac vice) wmandir@sughrue.com Chandran Iyer (pro hac vice) cbiyer@sughrue.com 2100 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W. Washington, DC 20037 Telephone: 202.293.7060 Facsimile: 202.293.7860 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff Logantree, L.P. 5 6 7 10 11 Dated: January 11, 2017 12 13 14 15 16 17 /s/ Clement S. Roberts ___________________ DURIE TANGRI LLP Clement S. Roberts (CA Bar No. 209203) croberts@durietangri.com Timothy C. Saulsbury (CA Bar No. 281434) tsaulsbury@durietangri.com James S. Tsuei (CA Bar No. 285530) jtsuei@durietangrui.com 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: 415.362.6666 Facsimile: 415.236.6300 18 Attorneys for Defendant Fitbit, Inc. 19 20 21 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 1/12/17 Dated: __________________________ ______________________________________ Honorable Richard Seeborg United States District Court Judge Northern District of California 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST TO VACATE SCHEDULING ORDER AND STAY PROCEEDINGS 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?