LoganTree LP v. FitBit Inc.
Filing
74
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 73 to vacate scheduling order and stay proceedings. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/12/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
H. Arnold Shokouhi (CA Bar No. 284144)
arnolds@mccathernlaw.com
Everett S. Hinchcliffe (Ca Bar No. 61508)
ehinchcliffe@mccathernlaw.com
MCCATHERN, PLLC
3710 Rawlins, Suite 1600
Dallas, Texas 75219
Telephone: 214.741.2662
Facsimile: 214.741.4717
10
William H. Mandir (pro hac vice)
wmandir@sughrue.com
Chandran Iyer (pro hac vice)
cbiyer@sughrue.com
SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
2100 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037
Telephone: 202.293.7060
Facsimile: 202.293.7860
11
Counsel for Plaintiff LoganTree, LP
7
8
9
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
LOGANTREE LP,
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Civil Action No. 16-cv-02443-RS
v.
FITBIT INC.
Defendant.
STIPULATED REQUEST TO
VACATE SCHEDULING ORDER
AND STAY PROCEEDINGS
PENDING DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
WHEREAS on October 2, 2015, Plaintiff Logantree L.P. (“Logantree”) filed this case in the
2
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas seeking damages, injunctive, and other
3
relief, and alleging that Defendant Fitbit Inc. (“Fitbit”) directly or indirectly infringed U.S. Patent
4
No. 6,059,576 (“‘576 patent”);
5
WHEREAS on March 18, 2016, Fitbit filed its Counterclaims and Answer to Logantree’s
6
Complaint asserting counterclaims of non-infringement and invalidity for each of the asserted patent;
7
WHEREAS on May 6, 2016, Judge Rodney Gilstrap of the United States District Court for
8
the Eastern District of Texas granted Fitbit’s motion to transfer this litigation to the Northern District
9
of California;
10
11
WHEREAS on August 4, 2016, this Court entered a Case Management Scheduling Order
[Docket No. 61] in this case;
12
WHEREAS Fitbit filed petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”) of the ‘576 patent with the
13
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office on
14
November 11, 2016 (IPR2017-00256) and November 12, 2016 (IPR2017-00258);
15
WHEREAS Plaintiff and Defendant settled this matter on November 16, 2016;
16
WHEREAS pursuant to the parties’ settlement, the parties have agreed to dismiss this action
17
18
19
20
21
with prejudice and to terminate IPR proceedings before the PTAB;
WHEREAS on December 13, 2016, the parties jointly requested authorization from the
PTAB to file papers terminating the IPR;
WHEREAS the parties are awaiting assignment of a PTAB panel to FitBit’s IPR in order to
file papers terminating the IPR;
22
THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiff and Defendant, through their
23
designated counsel, that the Case Management and Scheduling Order should be vacated and that all
24
proceedings in this action should be stayed until such time as the parties are able to dismiss this
25
action and to terminate the IPR pursuant to the terms of their settlement.
26
Dated: January 11, 2017
27
28
/s/ H. Arnold Shokouhi
MCCATHERN, PLLC
H. Arnold Shokouhi (CA Bar No. 284144)
arnolds@mccathernlaw.com
Everett S. Hinchcliffe (CA Bar No. 61508)
STIPULATED REQUEST TO VACATE SCHEDULING ORDER AND STAY PROCEEDINGS
2
1
ehinchcliffe@mccathernlaw.com
3710 Rawlins, Suite 1600
Dallas, Texas 75219
Telephone: 214.741.2662
Facsimile: 214.741.4717
2
3
4
8
SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
William H. Mandir (pro hac vice)
wmandir@sughrue.com
Chandran Iyer (pro hac vice)
cbiyer@sughrue.com
2100 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037
Telephone: 202.293.7060
Facsimile: 202.293.7860
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff Logantree, L.P.
5
6
7
10
11
Dated: January 11, 2017
12
13
14
15
16
17
/s/ Clement S. Roberts ___________________
DURIE TANGRI LLP
Clement S. Roberts (CA Bar No. 209203)
croberts@durietangri.com
Timothy C. Saulsbury (CA Bar No. 281434)
tsaulsbury@durietangri.com
James S. Tsuei (CA Bar No. 285530)
jtsuei@durietangrui.com
217 Leidesdorff Street
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: 415.362.6666
Facsimile: 415.236.6300
18
Attorneys for Defendant Fitbit, Inc.
19
20
21
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
25
1/12/17
Dated: __________________________
______________________________________
Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Court Judge
Northern District of California
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST TO VACATE SCHEDULING ORDER AND STAY PROCEEDINGS
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?