Kruger v. Colvin
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for pl extension to respond to D cross motion for summary judgment filed by Dan Kruger. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/20/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2016)
Case 3:16-cv-02459-EMC Document 17 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
RICHARD ZIEMAN (CSB 230832)
254 MILLER AVE., SUITE A
MILL VALLEY, CA 94941
Telephone: (415) 388-3800
Facsimile: (415) 388-1060
Email: Zieman@ssalawca.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
DANIEL KRUGER
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
14
Commissioner of Social Security
15
Defendant
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 3:16-cv-02459 EMC
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING
PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTION AND
BRIEF FILED IN RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT OR REMAND.
16
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the
18
approval of the Court, that Plaintiff may have an extension of 7 days in which to file Plaintiff’s
19
response to Defendant’s cross motion and brief filed in response to Plaintiff’s Motion for
20
Summary Judgment. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-1(e). Plaintiff’s response is now due on
21
November 1, 2016.
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
This is Plaintiff’s first request.
28
Case 3:16-cv-02459-EMC Document 17 Filed 10/19/16 Page 2 of 2
1
2
DATED:
October 19, 2016
3
_Richard Zieman /es/
RICHARD ZIEMAN
Attorney for Plaintiff
4
5
6
7
DATED:
October 19, 2016
8
Ben A. Porter /es/
BEN A. PORTER,
Specialist Assistant U.S. Attorney
9
10
11
12
13
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
14
J
A
H
ER
LI
RT
22
. Chen
ward M
udge Ed
NO
21
R NIA
19
20
D
EDWARD M. CHEN ERE
O ORD
IT IS S
United States District Judge
FO
18
___________________
UNIT
ED
17
10/20/16
DATED: __________
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
16
S
15
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
23
24
25
26
27
28
P’s Stip/Order of ext to submit reply to Pl’s MSJ, 16-CV-02459 EMC Page 2
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?