Chan et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Filing 11

ORDER GRANTING re 9 Stipulation to Extend Time For Defendant JP Morgan Chase to Respond filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 5/16/16. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Joseph E. Addiego III (CA SBN 169522)
John D. Freed (CA SBN 261518)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
WAYNE CHAN, et al.,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

12
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
14
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

Case No. 16-cv-02497
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE
BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CIVIL
LOCAL RULE 6-1(a)

1

WHEREAS, on April 6, 2016, Plaintiffs filed this action against Defendant JPMorgan

2

Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) in the California Superior Court, San Mateo County;

3

WHEREAS, May 9, 2016, Chase removed this action to this Court;

4

WHEREAS pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 81, Chase’s deadline to respond

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

to the complaint would be May 16, 2016; and
WHEREAS, Chase requires additional time to investigate the allegations in the Complaint
and to commence a dialogue with Plaintiffs regarding potential settlement;
NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Chase HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE AS
FOLLOWS:
1.

The deadline for Chase to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’

Complaint shall be extended up to and including June 16, 2016.
2.

This stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by

Court order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

15
16

DATED: May 12, 2016
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
Joseph E. Addiego III
John D. Freed

17
18

By:/s/ John D. Freed
John D. Freed

19
20

Attorneys for Defendant
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

21
22

MELLEN LAW FIRM
Eunji Cho

23 Dated: May 16, 2016

By: /s/ Eunji Cho
Eunji Cho
411 Borel Ave., Suite 230
San Mateo, CA 94402

LI

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

A

H

ER

R NIA

Spero

FO

seph C.

Judge Jo

RT

28

ERED

O ORD

IT IS S

NO

27

UNIT
ED

26

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

25

S

24

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

C

2

1

CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE

2

Pursuant to L.R. 5-1, I hereby attest that Eunji Cho, counsel for Plaintiffs Wayne and

3

Gladys Chan, has provided her concurrence in the electronic filing of the foregoing document

4

entitled STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK,

5

N.A. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1(a).

6

/s/ John D. Freed

7
John D. Freed
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME