Chan et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Filing
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation to Stay Action filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Motions terminated: 27 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation to Stay Action filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 21 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Case Management Statement due by 11/3/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/10/2016 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/22/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2016)
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
Presently before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation to Stay Action Pending Loan
3
Modification Review. Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the stipulation to permit the
4
parties to pursue loan modification as an alternative to litigation. Accordingly, this litigation is
5
STAYED.
6
On or before ninety (90) days after the Court’s issuance of this Order, the parties shall
7
submit a joint status report advising the Court of (a) the status of Plaintiff’s loan modification
8
application, and (b) the parties’ positions on whether the stay should remain in force or active
9
litigation resumed.
10
11
Chase shall have twenty (20) days from the date of any order lifting the stay in this case to
answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint.
12
13
SO ORDERED . Defendant's motion to dismiss is vacated. CMC reset for
11/10/16 at 9:30 a.m.
Date:
ISTRIC
_________________________________
ES D
T
UNIT
ED
S
15
C
RT
U
O
T
TA M. Chen
Hon. Edward
RT
19
ER
H
20
dw
Judge E
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION PENDING LOAN MODIFICATION REVIEW
Chen
FO
ard M.
NO
18
ORD
LI
17
O
IT IS S
R NIA
United States District Judge RED
E
16
A
14
7/22/16
_____________________
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?