Ridley v. Kaplan International North America, LLC

Filing 18

ORDER GRANTING 15 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint filed by Kaplan International North America, LLC. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C Spero on 6/24/16. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

CHERYL D. ORR (SBN 143196)
[e-mail]
VALERIE D. KAHN (SBN 286532)
[e-mail]
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2235
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
PHILIPPE A. LEBEL (SBN 274032)
[e-mail]
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
1800 Century Park East
Suite 1500
Los Angeles, CA 90067-1517
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

10
11

Attorneys for Defendant
KAPLAN, INC., erroneously sued as KAPLAN
INTERNATIONAL NORTH AMERICA, LLC

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16

KAITLIN RIDLEY, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated,

17
Plaintiff,
18

Case No. 3:16-cv-02536-JCS
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT KAPLAN, INC. TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

v.
19
20
21

KAPLAN INTERNATIONAL NORTH
AMERICA, LLC,
Defendant.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR KAPLAN TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02536-JCS

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendant Kaplan, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Kaplan”)1

1
2

and Plaintiff Kaitlin Ridley (“Plaintiff” or “Ridley”), by and through their respective counsel,

3

hereby stipulate as follows:

4
5

WHEREAS, Ridley served her Collective and Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”) on
June 1, 2016;

6
7

WHEREAS, Kaplan currently has until June 22, 2016 to answer or respond to Ridley’s
Complaint;

8
9

WHEREAS, Kaplan has requested and Ridley has consented to an additional two weeks
for Kaplan’s answer or response to Ridley’s Complaint;

10
11

WHEREAS, an additional two weeks for Kaplan’s answer or response to Ridley’s
Complaint will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order;

12

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties,

13

through their respective counsel, that Kaplan shall answer or otherwise respond to Ridley’s

14

Complaint by July 6, 2016.

15
16

Dated: June 22, 2016

DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP

17
18

By: /s/ Cheryl D. Orr
Cheryl D. Orr
Valerie D. Kahn
Phillippe A. Lebel

19
20

Attorneys for Defendant
KAPLAN, INC., erroneously sued as
KAPLAN INTERNATIONAL NORTH
AMERICA, LLC

21
22
23
24
25
26
1

27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

Defendant contends that Kaplan, Inc. is the properly named party and that it was
erroneously sued as Kaplan International North America, LLC. Plaintiff will amend the
complaint to name a different party if appropriate.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR KAPLAN TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

-2-

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02536-JCS

1

Dated: June 22, 2016

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, PC

2
3

By: /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Shannon Liss-Riordan
Thomas Fowler
Matthew D. Carlson

4
5

Attorneys for Plaintiff
KAITLIN RIDLEY

6
7
8
9

I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any
signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.

10
/s/ Cheryl D. Orr

11
S

LI

ER

R NIA

Spero

A

H

17

seph C.

Judge Jo

RT

16

ERED

O ORD

IT IS S

NO

15

UNIT
ED

14

Dated: June 24, 2016

RT
U
O

13

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

FO

85921082.3

12

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR KAPLAN TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

-3-

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-02536-JCS