Pytel v. Sunrun Inc. et al

Filing 16

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 15 Stipulation EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ANNA ERICKSON WHITE (CA SBN 161385) AWhite@mofo.com ROBERT L. CORTEZ WEBB (CA SBN 274742) RWebb@mofo.com SU-HAN WANG (CA SBN 284863) SWang@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendants Sunrun Inc., Lynn Jurich, Bob Komin, Edward Fenster, Jameson McJunkin, Gerald Risk, Steve Vassallo, Richard Wong, Beau Peelle, Eren Omer Atesmen, Reginald Norris, William Elmore, Foundation Capital VI, L.P., and Foundation Capital Management Co. VI, LLC 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 JEFFREY L. PYTEL, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 16 Plaintiff, 17 Case No. 3:16-CV-02566-HSG STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND v. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SUNRUN INC., LYNN JURICH, BOB KOMIN, EDWARD FENSTER, JAMESON MCJUNKIN, GERALD RISK, STEVE VASSALLO, RICHARD WONG, BEAU PEELLE, EREN OMER ATESMEN, REGINALD NORRIS, WILLIAM ELMORE, FOUNDATION CAPITAL VI, L.P., FOUNDATION CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CO. VI, LLC, CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC, GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC, MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED, RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, KEYBANC CAPITAL MARKETS INC., and SUNTRUST ROBINSON HUMPHREY, INC., ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION [L.R. CIV. 6-2] 26 Defendants. 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER sf-3657478 1 Plaintiff Jeffrey L. Pytel (“Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned counsel, and 2 Defendants Sunrun Inc., Lynn Jurich, Bob Komin, Edward Fenster, Jameson McJunkin, Gerald 3 Risk, Steve Vassallo, Richard Wong, Beau Peelle, Eren Omer Atesmen, Reginald Norris, William 4 Elmore, Foundation Capital VI, L.P., and Foundation Capital Management Co. VI, LLC (the 5 “Sunrun Defendants”), as well as Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co., 6 Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, RBC Capital 7 Markets, LLC, KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. (the 8 “Underwriter Defendants,” collectively with the Sunrun Defendants, “Defendants”), by and 9 through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 10 WHEREAS Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand this action on May 17, 2016; 11 WHEREAS, the plaintiffs in five additional actions against Defendants filed motions to 12 remand those actions between May 17, 2016, and May 19, 2016; WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiff’s motion is 13 14 currently due by May 31, 2016; 15 WHEREAS Plaintiff’s reply to Defendants’ opposition is currently due by June 7, 2016; 16 WHEREAS Plaintiff’s motion is scheduled to be heard in this Court on July 28, 2016; 17 WHEREAS Defendants have moved the Court for an Order relating the six pending 18 removed state court securities class actions to the similar securities class action originally filed in 19 federal court; 20 WHEREAS the plaintiffs in the six removed actions have opposed Defendants’ Motion to 21 Relate, and instead requested that the Court relate only the six removed state court securities class 22 actions; WHEREAS Defendants’ motion is currently under submission before the Hon. Charles R. 23 24 Breyer; 25 WHEREAS the undersigned parties are currently negotiating with plaintiffs in the five 26 additional removed actions regarding coordinated briefing on the pending motions to remand; 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER sf-3657478 2 1 WHEREAS the undersigned parties agree that a short extension of time for Defendants to 2 oppose Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is appropriate in light of the anticipated coordinated briefing 3 of the six pending motions to remand; 4 WHEREAS this extension will not affect the noticed hearing date; 5 WHEREAS, in the interest of efficiency and judicial economy, the parties have previously 6 stipulated to defer Defendant’s response to the complaint in this action pending the resolution of 7 Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand; 8 9 10 WHEREAS, other than the dates of the opposition and reply to Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, this stipulation will not affect or alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order or otherwise affect the schedule of the case; 11 NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE as follows: 12 1. 13 June 2, 2016; and, 14 2. Defendants shall file an opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand on or before Plaintiff shall file a reply to Defendants’ opposition on or before June 9, 2016. 15 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER sf-3657478 3 1 Dated: May 31, 2016 Dated: May 31, 2016 2 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: By: 3 /s/ James I. Jaconette /s/ Anna Erickson White 4 5 6 7 8 Attorney for Plaintiff Attorneys for the Sunrun Defendants James I. Jaconette (SBN 179565) 655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101-8498 Telephone: 619.231.1058 Facsimile: 619.231.7423 Dated: SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP By: 9 May 31, 2016 /s/ Patrick D. Robbins Attorneys for the Underwriter Defendants 10 Patrick D. Robbins 535 Mission Street, 25th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415.616.1100 Facsimile: 415.616.1199 Email: probbins@shearman.com 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER 18 19 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 20 21 22 23 24 Dated: June 1, 2016 ____________________________________ Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER sf-3657478 4 1 2 3 4 5 ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE I, Anna Erickson White, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that James I. Jaconette and Patrick D. Robbins concur in this filing. 6 7 Dated: May 31, 2016 /s/ Anna Erickson White Anna Erickson White 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER sf-3657478 5 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on May 31, 2016, I electronically transmitted the attached 3 document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a 4 Notice of Electronic Filing to all CM/ECF registrants. 5 6 7 /s/Kenneth L.P. MacCardle Kenneth L.P. MacCardle 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER sf-3657478 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?