Pytel v. Sunrun Inc. et al
Filing
16
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 15 Stipulation EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ANNA ERICKSON WHITE (CA SBN 161385)
AWhite@mofo.com
ROBERT L. CORTEZ WEBB (CA SBN 274742)
RWebb@mofo.com
SU-HAN WANG (CA SBN 284863)
SWang@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: 415.268.7000
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendants
Sunrun Inc., Lynn Jurich, Bob Komin, Edward Fenster, Jameson
McJunkin, Gerald Risk, Steve Vassallo, Richard Wong, Beau
Peelle, Eren Omer Atesmen, Reginald Norris, William Elmore,
Foundation Capital VI, L.P., and Foundation Capital
Management Co. VI, LLC
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
JEFFREY L. PYTEL, Individually and on Behalf
of All Others Similarly Situated,
16
Plaintiff,
17
Case No.
3:16-CV-02566-HSG
STIPULATION EXTENDING
TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION TO
REMAND
v.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SUNRUN INC., LYNN JURICH, BOB KOMIN,
EDWARD FENSTER, JAMESON MCJUNKIN,
GERALD RISK, STEVE VASSALLO,
RICHARD WONG, BEAU PEELLE, EREN
OMER ATESMEN, REGINALD NORRIS,
WILLIAM ELMORE, FOUNDATION
CAPITAL VI, L.P., FOUNDATION CAPITAL
MANAGEMENT CO. VI, LLC, CREDIT
SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC, GOLDMAN,
SACHS & CO., MORGAN STANLEY & CO.
LLC, MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER &
SMITH INCORPORATED, RBC CAPITAL
MARKETS, LLC, KEYBANC CAPITAL
MARKETS INC., and SUNTRUST ROBINSON
HUMPHREY, INC.,
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION
[L.R. CIV. 6-2]
26
Defendants.
27
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
sf-3657478
1
Plaintiff Jeffrey L. Pytel (“Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned counsel, and
2
Defendants Sunrun Inc., Lynn Jurich, Bob Komin, Edward Fenster, Jameson McJunkin, Gerald
3
Risk, Steve Vassallo, Richard Wong, Beau Peelle, Eren Omer Atesmen, Reginald Norris, William
4
Elmore, Foundation Capital VI, L.P., and Foundation Capital Management Co. VI, LLC (the
5
“Sunrun Defendants”), as well as Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co.,
6
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, RBC Capital
7
Markets, LLC, KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. (the
8
“Underwriter Defendants,” collectively with the Sunrun Defendants, “Defendants”), by and
9
through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
10
WHEREAS Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand this action on May 17, 2016;
11
WHEREAS, the plaintiffs in five additional actions against Defendants filed motions to
12
remand those actions between May 17, 2016, and May 19, 2016;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 7-3, Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiff’s motion is
13
14
currently due by May 31, 2016;
15
WHEREAS Plaintiff’s reply to Defendants’ opposition is currently due by June 7, 2016;
16
WHEREAS Plaintiff’s motion is scheduled to be heard in this Court on July 28, 2016;
17
WHEREAS Defendants have moved the Court for an Order relating the six pending
18
removed state court securities class actions to the similar securities class action originally filed in
19
federal court;
20
WHEREAS the plaintiffs in the six removed actions have opposed Defendants’ Motion to
21
Relate, and instead requested that the Court relate only the six removed state court securities class
22
actions;
WHEREAS Defendants’ motion is currently under submission before the Hon. Charles R.
23
24
Breyer;
25
WHEREAS the undersigned parties are currently negotiating with plaintiffs in the five
26
additional removed actions regarding coordinated briefing on the pending motions to remand;
27
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
sf-3657478
2
1
WHEREAS the undersigned parties agree that a short extension of time for Defendants to
2
oppose Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is appropriate in light of the anticipated coordinated briefing
3
of the six pending motions to remand;
4
WHEREAS this extension will not affect the noticed hearing date;
5
WHEREAS, in the interest of efficiency and judicial economy, the parties have previously
6
stipulated to defer Defendant’s response to the complaint in this action pending the resolution of
7
Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand;
8
9
10
WHEREAS, other than the dates of the opposition and reply to Plaintiff’s Motion to
Remand, this stipulation will not affect or alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by
Court order or otherwise affect the schedule of the case;
11
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE as follows:
12
1.
13
June 2, 2016; and,
14
2.
Defendants shall file an opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand on or before
Plaintiff shall file a reply to Defendants’ opposition on or before June 9, 2016.
15
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
sf-3657478
3
1
Dated: May 31, 2016
Dated:
May 31, 2016
2
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD
LLP
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
By:
By:
3
/s/ James I. Jaconette
/s/ Anna Erickson White
4
5
6
7
8
Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorneys for the Sunrun Defendants
James I. Jaconette (SBN 179565)
655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900
San Diego, CA 92101-8498
Telephone: 619.231.1058
Facsimile: 619.231.7423
Dated:
SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
By:
9
May 31, 2016
/s/ Patrick D. Robbins
Attorneys for the Underwriter Defendants
10
Patrick D. Robbins
535 Mission Street, 25th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: 415.616.1100
Facsimile: 415.616.1199
Email: probbins@shearman.com
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER
18
19
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
20
21
22
23
24
Dated: June 1, 2016
____________________________________
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
sf-3657478
4
1
2
3
4
5
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
I, Anna Erickson White, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file
this STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION TO REMAND. In
compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that James I. Jaconette and Patrick D.
Robbins concur in this filing.
6
7
Dated: May 31, 2016
/s/ Anna Erickson White
Anna Erickson White
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
sf-3657478
5
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I hereby certify that on May 31, 2016, I electronically transmitted the attached
3
document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a
4
Notice of Electronic Filing to all CM/ECF registrants.
5
6
7
/s/Kenneth L.P. MacCardle
Kenneth L.P. MacCardle
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE MOTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
sf-3657478
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?