Amgen Inc. et al v. Sandoz Inc. et al
Filing
61
STIPULATION AND ORDER of Dismissal of All Claims and Counterclaims Related to U.S. Patent No. 5,824,784. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg' on 12/7/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
Vernon M. Winters (SBN 130128)
Alexander D. Baxter (SBN 281569)
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104-1503
Telephone: (415) 772-1200
Facsimile: (415) 772-7400
vwinters@sidley.com
PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON
& GARRISON LLP
Nicholas Groombridge (pro hac vice)
Eric Alan Stone (pro hac vice)
Jennifer H. Wu (pro hac vice)
Jennifer Gordon
Peter Sandel (pro hac vice)
Ana Friedman (pro hac vice)
Arielle K. Linsey (pro hac vice)
Stephen A. Maniscalco (pro hac vice)
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10019-6064
Telephone: (212) 373-3000
Facsimile: (212) 757-3990
ngroombridge@paulweiss.com
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
James Beard (SBN 267242)
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 439-1689
james.beard@kirkland.
James F. Hurst (pro hac vice)
Cristina Q. Almendarez (pro hac vice)
300 North LaSalle
Chicago, IL 60654
Telephone: (312) 862-2000
james.hurst@kirkland.com
cristina.almendarez@kirkland.com
Jeanna M. Wacker (pro hac vice)
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Telephone: (212) 446-4800
jeanna.wacker@kirkland.com
Attorneys for Defendants Sandoz Inc.
AMGEN INC.
Wendy A. Whiteford (SBN 150283)
Lois M. Kwasigroch (SBN 130159)
One Amgen Center Drive
Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1789
Telephone: (805) 447-1000
Facsimile: (805) 447-1010
wendy@amgen.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Amgen Inc.
and Amgen Manufacturing Limited
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
20
21
22
AMGEN INC. and
AMGEN MANUFACTURING LIMITED,
Case No. 3:16-CV-02581-RS
23
24
25
26
27
Plaintiffs,
vs.
SANDOZ INC., SANDOZ
INTERNATIONAL GMBH, and
SANDOZ GMBH, LEK
PHARMACEUTICALS, D.D.
Defendants.
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
OF ALL CLAIMS AND
COUNTERCLAIMS RELATED TO U.S.
PATENT NO. 5,824,784, AND
PROPOSED ORDER
28
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
ALL CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS
RELATED TO U.S. PATENT NO. 5,824,784
1
Case No. 3:16-CV-02581-RS
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiffs Amgen Inc. and Amgen Manufacturing
2
Limited (collectively, “Amgen”) and Defendant Sandoz Inc., by and through their counsel,
3
jointly stipulate to the dismissal, without prejudice, of all claims and counterclaims related to
4
U.S. Patent No. 5,824,784 (“the ’784 Patent”) on the terms set forth herein:
5
1.
Amgen’s cause of action directed solely to the ’784 Patent, specifically the Third
Cause of Action of its Complaint filed May 12, 2016 [Dkt. No. 1], is hereby
dismissed without prejudice.
2.
Sandoz Inc.’s counterclaims directed solely to the ’784 Patent, specifically the
Third Counterclaim and the Fourth Counterclaim of Sandoz Inc.’s Answer and
Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims filed June 23, 2016 [Dkt. No. 18], are
hereby dismissed without prejudice.
3.
The parties agree that neither party is a prevailing party with respect to the ’784
Patent, and accordingly no party shall be entitled to attorneys’ fees or costs with
respect to the ’784 Patent, either now or at any future point in the case. To avoid
any doubt, this stipulated dismissal of the ’784 Patent shall play no role in any
argument for or determination of attorneys’ fees and costs in this litigation.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
ALL CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS
RELATED TO U.S. PATENT NO. 5,824,784
2
Case No. 3:16-CV-02581-RS
1
Dated: December 1, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
By: /s/ Vernon M. Winters
Vernon M. Winters (SBN 130128)
Alexander D. Baxter (SBN 281569)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104-1503
Telephone: (415) 772-1200
Facsimile: (415) 772-7400
vwinters@sidley.com
Nicholas Groombridge (pro hac vice)
Eric Alan Stone (pro hac vice)
Jennifer H. Wu (pro hac vice)
Jennifer Gordon
Peter Sandel (pro hac vice)
Ana Friedman (pro hac vice)
Arielle K. Linsey (pro hac vice)
Stephen A. Maniscalco (pro hac vice)
PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON
& GARRISON LLP
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10019-6064
Telephone: (212) 373-3000
Facsimile: (212) 757-3990
ngroombridge@paulweiss.com
By: /s/ James Beard
James Beard (SBN 267242)
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 439-1689
james.beard@kirkland.
James F. Hurst (pro hac vice)
Cristina Q. Almendarez (pro hac vice)
300 North LaSalle
Chicago, IL 60654
Telephone: (312) 862-2000
james.hurst@kirkland.com
cristina.almendarez@kirkland.com
Jeanna M. Wacker (pro hac vice)
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Telephone: (212) 446-4800
jeanna.wacker@kirkland.com
Attorneys for Defendants Sandoz Inc.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Wendy A. Whiteford (SBN 150283)
Lois M. Kwasigroch (SBN 130159)
AMGEN INC.
One Amgen Center Drive
Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1789
Telephone: (805) 447-1000
Facsimile: (805) 447-1010
wendy@amgen.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Amgen Inc.
and Amgen Manufacturing Limited
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
ALL CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS
RELATED TO U.S. PATENT NO. 5,824,784
3
Case No. 3:16-CV-02581-RS
ECF ATTESTATION
1
I, Vernon M. Winters, am the ECF User whose ID and Password are being used to file
2
3
4
5
this document. I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the
above signatories.
Dated: December 1, 2016
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
By: /s/ Vernon M. Winters
6
7
8
9
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
12
Dated:
12/7
, 2016
THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
ALL CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS
RELATED TO U.S. PATENT NO. 5,824,784
4
Case No. 3:16-CV-02581-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?