Doe et al v. City of Novato et al

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 34 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by City of Novato, Oliver Collins , Jeffrey A. Ames, and Sasha D'Amico filed by City of Novato, Oliver Collins. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 19, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2016)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Jeffrey A. Ames and Sasha M. D'Amico Plaintiff(s) , CASE No C 3:16-cv-02590-JSC JST STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS v. City of Novato and Lt. Oliver Collins , Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) Private ADR (specify process and provider) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) other requested deadline: Date: 9/14/2016 /S/ Fulvio Cajina Attorney for Plaintiffs Date: 9/14/2016 /S/ Suzanne Solomon Attorney for Defendants X IT IS SO ORDERED IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: September 19, 2016 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. 7-2016 American LegalNet, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?