Evellard v. LendingClub Corporation et al
Filing
229
ORDER RE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME TO HEAR MOTION TO INTERVENE Signed by Judge Alsup on 9/22/2017. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
In re LENDINGCLUB SECURITIES LITIGATION
12
/
(Consolidated)
13
14
15
16
17
No. C 16-02627 WHA
No. C 16-02670 WHA
No. C 16-03072 WHA
ORDER RE MOTION TO
SHORTEN TIME TO HEAR
MOTION TO INTERVENE
This Document Relates to:
ALL ACTIONS.
/
On September 21, class representatives in a certified class action pending in California
18
Superior Court, In re Lending Club Corp. S’holder Litig., No. CIV 537000 (Cal. Super. Ct., San
19
Mateo City), moved for an order shortening time so that the Court could consider their motion
20
to intervene for the purpose of objecting to class certification in the above-caption action (Dkt.
21
No 222). Along with their motion to shorten time, the putative intervenors filed a motion to
22
intervene and a motion objecting to class certification (Dkt. No. 222-1 Exhs. A, B).
23
All parties in the above-captioned action may separately respond to each of these
24
motions — to shorten time, to intervene, and objecting to class certification — by NOON ON
25
OCTOBER 5. Putative intervenors will not be permitted to reply due to the lateness of their
26
filing, but they may appear on the motions to shorten time and to intervene, and if intervention
27
28
1
is granted on the motion for class certification. All motions will be heard at the same time as
2
the class certification motion, OCTOBER 12, AT 8:00 A.M.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
8
Dated: September 22, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?