Evellard v. LendingClub Corporation et al
Filing
245
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A RESPONSE by Judge William Alsup granting 240 Motion for Leave to File.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
In re LENDINGCLUB SECURITIES LITIGATION
12
/
(Consolidated)
13
14
15
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A
RESPONSE
This Document Relates to:
ALL ACTIONS.
/
16
17
No. C 16-02627 WHA
No. C 16-02670 WHA
No. C 16-03072 WHA
On September 21, lead plaintiffs in In re LendingClub Corp. S’holder Litig., No.
18
CIV537000 (Cal. Super. Ct., San Mateo Cty.) moved to intervene for the limited purpose of
19
objecting to class certification in this action (Dkt. No. 222). An order granted all the parties in
20
this action an opportunity to respond to state plaintiffs’ motion to intervene and their motion
21
opposing class certification, but because of the lateness of state plaintiffs’ filing did not permit
22
them an opportunity to reply (Dkt. No. 229).
23
On October 5, lead plaintiff in this action, Water and Power Employees’ Retirement,
24
Disability and Death Plan of the City of Los Angeles (“WPERP”), filed a response to state
25
plaintiffs’ motions (Dkt. No. 235). In addition to responding to state plaintiffs’ arguments, the
26
“response” requested this Court enjoin the state action.
27
State plaintiffs now seek leave to file an opposition to address WPERP’s request for an
28
injunction (which opposition is appended to their motion for leave). State plaintiffs’ motion is
1
GRANTED for the limited purpose of addressing WPERP’s arguments that the state action
2
should be enjoined.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
8
Dated: October 11, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?