Wilkes v. City of San Francisco et al

Filing 5

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 6/27/16. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DAVID GASTON WILKES, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 16-cv-02636-JD ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. Re: Dkt. No. 2 CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Pursuant to plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal (Docket No. 4) under Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall close the file and terminate the pending motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 2) as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 27, 2016 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JAMES DONATO United States District Judge 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 DAVID GASTON WILKES, Case No. 16-cv-02636-JD Plaintiff, 5 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 6 7 CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants. 8 9 10 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 That on June 27, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 16 17 18 David Gaston Wilkes 1 Moreland Drive #16664366 San Bruno, CA 94066 19 20 21 Dated: June 27, 2016 22 23 Susan Y. Soong Clerk, United States District Court 24 25 26 27 By:________________________ LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the Honorable JAMES DONATO 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?