Vigil v. Colgate-Palmolive Co

Filing 18

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR BRIEF EXTENSION OF STAY. The current stay of this matter is extended to November 4, 2016. On or before November 4, 2016, the parties shall submit a further status report. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 10/14/16. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 MELISSA L. VIGIL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE CO. Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:16-cv-02697-MMC Judge Maxine M. Chesney [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR BRIEF EXTENSION OF STAY Complaint Filed: Complaint Served: Response Due: New Response Date: May 18, 2016 May 27, 2016 T.B.D. T.B.D. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR BRIEF EXTENSION OF STAY Case No. 3:16-cv-02697-MMC 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 2 3 BRIEF EXTENSION OF STAY The Court has reviewed and considered the Joint Status Report and 4 Stipulated Request For Brief Extension Of Stay submitted by Plaintiff Melissa 5 Vigil (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Colgate-Palmolive Company (“Defendants”) in 6 the above-captioned action. 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the current stay of this matter 8 is extended for twenty-one (21) days to permit the parties to continue discussing 9 coordination or resolution of this matter. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the 10 parties submit a further status report on or before November 4, 2016. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 Dated: October 14 , 2016 The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR BRIEF EXTENSION OF STAY Case No. 3:16-cv-02697-MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?