Voting Rights Defense Project v. Padilla et al
Filing
18
SCHEDULING ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 17 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Response date, if any, is set by the court despite the default phrase of "due by 5/31/16"in this docket text;. Responses due by 5/31/2016. Motion Hearing set for 6/1/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 5/27/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
VOTING RIGHTS DEFENSE PROJECT,
AMERICAN INDEPENDENT PARTY,
CLARA DAIMS, and SUZANNE
BUSHNELL,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
No. C 16-02739 WHA
v.
ALEX PADILLA, in his official capacity
as Secretary of State and an indispensable
party, TIM DEPUIS, in his official capacity
as chief of the Alameda County Registrar
of Voters, JOHN ARNTZ, in his official
capacity as Director of the San Francisco
Board of Elections, and DOES I–X,
SCHEDULING ORDER ON
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
Defendants.
/
19
20
Plaintiffs commenced this action on May 20. Today, over a week later and without any
21
explanation for the delay, plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction and an ex parte
22
motion seeking to shorten time for a hearing on that motion. A hearing on the motion is hereby
23
scheduled for WEDNESDAY, JUNE 1 AT 11:00 A.M. in Courtroom 8 on the 19th floor of the
24
federal courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco. The summons, complaint,
25
motion, and all supporting declarations, as well as this order, must be served on defendants by
26
TOMORROW, MAY 28 AT 4:00 P.M. Defendants may submit an opposition to the motion by
27
TUESDAY, MAY 31 AT 4:00 P.M. No replies please.
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 27, 2016.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?