Voting Rights Defense Project v. Padilla et al

Filing 18

SCHEDULING ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 17 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Response date, if any, is set by the court despite the default phrase of "due by 5/31/16"in this docket text;. Responses due by 5/31/2016. Motion Hearing set for 6/1/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 5/27/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 VOTING RIGHTS DEFENSE PROJECT, AMERICAN INDEPENDENT PARTY, CLARA DAIMS, and SUZANNE BUSHNELL, Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 No. C 16-02739 WHA v. ALEX PADILLA, in his official capacity as Secretary of State and an indispensable party, TIM DEPUIS, in his official capacity as chief of the Alameda County Registrar of Voters, JOHN ARNTZ, in his official capacity as Director of the San Francisco Board of Elections, and DOES I–X, SCHEDULING ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Defendants. / 19 20 Plaintiffs commenced this action on May 20. Today, over a week later and without any 21 explanation for the delay, plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction and an ex parte 22 motion seeking to shorten time for a hearing on that motion. A hearing on the motion is hereby 23 scheduled for WEDNESDAY, JUNE 1 AT 11:00 A.M. in Courtroom 8 on the 19th floor of the 24 federal courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco. The summons, complaint, 25 motion, and all supporting declarations, as well as this order, must be served on defendants by 26 TOMORROW, MAY 28 AT 4:00 P.M. Defendants may submit an opposition to the motion by 27 TUESDAY, MAY 31 AT 4:00 P.M. No replies please. 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 27, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?