Huawei Technologies, Co, Ltd et al v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. et al
Filing
112
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DATES re #111 Stipulation. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/26/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2017)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
4
5
6
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,
HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., and
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.,
7
Plaintiff(s)/Counterclaim
Defendants,
8
vs.
9
10
11
12
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD,
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC.,
Defendants / CounterclaimPlaintiffs,
and
13
14
SAMSUNG RESEARCH AMERICA,
15
Defendant,
16
v.
17
18
HISILICON TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,
Counterclaim-Defendant.
)
) Case Number: 3:16-cv-2787-WHO
)
)
)
)
) STIPULATION & ORDER
) RE: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DATES
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
19
20
It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Plaintiffs HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES
21
CO., LTD., HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC., and
22
HISILICON TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. (collectively, “Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-
23
Defendant”), and Defendants SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. (“SEC”), SAMSUNG
24
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. (“SEA”), and SAMSUNG RESEARCH AMERICA (“SRA”)
25
(collectively, “Defendants”), through their respective counsel, that the initial claim construction
26
disclosure dates be rescheduled as follows:
27
28
1
STIPULATION & ORDER RE: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DATES
1
2
3
4
4-1 Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction
Exchange of Preliminary Constructions and
4-2
Extrinsic Evidence
Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing
4-3
Statement
Current Date
Feb. 10, 2017
Proposed Date
Feb. 24, 2017
Mar. 3, 2017
Mar. 17, 2017
Mar. 24, 2017
Apr. 7, 2017
5
6
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a), the parties state that there have been six previous
7
modifications in this case: (1) a stipulation for an extension of time for Defendants to respond to
8
Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Dkt. 30); (2) a stipulation to reschedule the initial Case Management
9
Conference, and for an extension of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint
10
(Dkt. 37); (3) a stipulation to reschedule the hearing date and briefing deadlines for Defendants’
11
partial motion to dismiss (Dkt. 62); (4) a stipulation for extension of time for Plaintiffs and
12
Counterclaim Defendants to respond to Defendants’ answer and counterclaims (Dkt. 68); (5) a
13
stipulation to reschedule the hearing on Samsung’s partial motion to dismiss and extend briefing
14
deadlines (Dkt. 81); and (6) a stipulation to reschedule the hearing on Samsung’s partial motion
15
to dismiss and extend briefing deadlines (Dkt. 83).
16
17
18
19
The requested change to the initial claim construction deadlines will have no effect on
other deadlines in this case.
IT IS SO STIPULATED, through Counsel of Record.
Dated: January 19, 2016
20
/s/ Michael J. Bettinger
Counsel for Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants
21
Dated: January 19, 2016
/s/ Marissa R. Ducca
22
Counsel for Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs
23
24
25
26
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 1/26/2017
The Honorable William H. Orrick
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
2
STIPULATION & ORDER RE: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?