Huawei Technologies, Co, Ltd et al v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. et al

Filing 112

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DATES re #111 Stipulation. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/26/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2017)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 4 5 6 HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., and HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC., 7 Plaintiff(s)/Counterclaim Defendants, 8 vs. 9 10 11 12 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants / CounterclaimPlaintiffs, and 13 14 SAMSUNG RESEARCH AMERICA, 15 Defendant, 16 v. 17 18 HISILICON TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., Counterclaim-Defendant. ) ) Case Number: 3:16-cv-2787-WHO ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION & ORDER ) RE: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DATES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 19 20 It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Plaintiffs HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES 21 CO., LTD., HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC., and 22 HISILICON TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. (collectively, “Plaintiffs and Counterclaim- 23 Defendant”), and Defendants SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. (“SEC”), SAMSUNG 24 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. (“SEA”), and SAMSUNG RESEARCH AMERICA (“SRA”) 25 (collectively, “Defendants”), through their respective counsel, that the initial claim construction 26 disclosure dates be rescheduled as follows: 27 28 1 STIPULATION & ORDER RE: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DATES 1 2 3 4 4-1 Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction Exchange of Preliminary Constructions and 4-2 Extrinsic Evidence Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing 4-3 Statement Current Date Feb. 10, 2017 Proposed Date Feb. 24, 2017 Mar. 3, 2017 Mar. 17, 2017 Mar. 24, 2017 Apr. 7, 2017 5 6 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a), the parties state that there have been six previous 7 modifications in this case: (1) a stipulation for an extension of time for Defendants to respond to 8 Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Dkt. 30); (2) a stipulation to reschedule the initial Case Management 9 Conference, and for an extension of time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint 10 (Dkt. 37); (3) a stipulation to reschedule the hearing date and briefing deadlines for Defendants’ 11 partial motion to dismiss (Dkt. 62); (4) a stipulation for extension of time for Plaintiffs and 12 Counterclaim Defendants to respond to Defendants’ answer and counterclaims (Dkt. 68); (5) a 13 stipulation to reschedule the hearing on Samsung’s partial motion to dismiss and extend briefing 14 deadlines (Dkt. 81); and (6) a stipulation to reschedule the hearing on Samsung’s partial motion 15 to dismiss and extend briefing deadlines (Dkt. 83). 16 17 18 19 The requested change to the initial claim construction deadlines will have no effect on other deadlines in this case. IT IS SO STIPULATED, through Counsel of Record. Dated: January 19, 2016 20 /s/ Michael J. Bettinger Counsel for Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants 21 Dated: January 19, 2016 /s/ Marissa R. Ducca 22 Counsel for Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs 23 24 25 26 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 1/26/2017 The Honorable William H. Orrick UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 2 STIPULATION & ORDER RE: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?