Huawei Technologies, Co, Ltd et al v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. et al

Filing 239

ORDER granting #238 STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO CHANGE DEADLINES FOR OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS - Reset Deadlines as to #235 MOTION to Enjoin Huawei from Enforcing the Injunction Issued by the Intermediate People's Court of Shenzhen. Response due by 2/20/2018. Reply due by 2/28/2018. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 02/13/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2018)

1

[COUNSEL LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGE]

2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

4
5
6
7

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,
HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., and
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.

8
9
10
11
12

Case No. 16-cv-02787-WHO

Plaintiffs / CounterclaimDefendants,

STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER
TO CHANGE DEADLINES FOR
OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS TO
DOCKET NUMBERS 234-35

v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC.,

13

Defendants / CounterclaimPlaintiffs,

14

and

15

SAMSUNG RESEARCH AMERICA, INC.,

16

Defendant,

17

v.

18

HISILICON TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,

19

Counterclaim-Defendant.

20
21

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants

22

Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei Technologies USA, Inc., and

23

HiSilicon Technologies Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Huawei”) and Defendants and Counterclaim-

24

Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung

25

Research America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”), through their respective counsel, respectfully

26

request that the Court reschedule the deadlines for Huawei’s opposition and Samsung’s reply briefs

27

to Samsung’s Motion to Enjoin Huawei from Enforcing the Injunction Issued by the Intermediate

28
1
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE BRIEFING DEADLINES

1

People’s Court of Shenzhen (“Samsung’s Motion”), which was filed at Dkt. 234 (under seal) and

2

Dkt. 235 (public version). The requested changes are as follows:

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Event

Current Date

Proposed Date

Huawei’s opposition to Samsung’s
Motion

Feb. 15, 2018

Feb. 19, 2018
Feb. 20, 2018

Samsung’s reply re: Samsung’s
Motion

Feb. 22, 2018

Feb. 28, 2018

Hearing on Samsung’s Motion

Mar. 14, 2018

Mar. 14, 2018
(no change)

Huawei has requested, and Samsung has agreed to the requested changes to accommodate
the schedules of Huawei and its counsel. The requested changes will not have an effect on other
deadlines in this case. In addition, the requested changes will still give the Court two weeks to
review the parties’ papers before the March 14, 2018 hearing date.
Previous Time Modifications in the Case
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a), the parties state that there have been nine previous time
modifications in this case: (1) a stipulation extending the time for Samsung to respond to Huawei’s
Complaint (Dkt. 30); (2) a stipulation and order rescheduling the initial Case Management
Conference and extending the time for Samsung to respond to Huawei’s Complaint (Dkt. 38); (3) a
stipulation and order rescheduling the hearing date and briefing deadlines for Samsung’s Partial
Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 62); (4) a stipulation extending the time for Huawei to respond to
Samsung’s Answer and Counterclaims (Dkt. 68); (5) a stipulation and order rescheduling the
hearing date and briefing deadlines for Samsung’s Partial Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 83); (6) a
stipulation and order rescheduling the initial claim construction disclosure dates (Dkt. 112); (7) a
stipulation and order rescheduling the initial technology tutorial and claim construction dates
(Dkt. 139); (8) a stipulation and order rescheduling the claim construction hearing date (Dkt. 157)
and (9) an order extending the close of discovery, resetting the trial date, and adjusting intermediate
deadlines (Dkt. 207).

27
28
2
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE BRIEFING DEADLINES

1

Dated: February 13, 2018

Respectfully Submitted,

2

By: /s/ Michael J. Bettinger

By: /s/ Marissa Ducca

Michael J. Bettinger (SBN 122196)
[e-mail]
Irene Yang (SBN 245464)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street, Ste. 2000
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
[e-mail]
David A. Perlson (Cal. Bar No. 209502)
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

David T. Pritikin (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
David C. Giardina (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Douglas I. Lewis (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
John W. McBride (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
One South Dearborn
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Kevin Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
[e-mail]
Victoria Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and
Samsung Research America, Inc.

Attorneys for Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.,
Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei
Technologies USA, Inc., and HiSilicon
Technologies Co., Ltd.

Response deadline is revised to avoid the President's Day Holiday, when the CM/ECF system may
be offline for maintenance.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AS MODIFIED IT IS SO ORDERED
Dated:February 13, 2018

The Honorable William H. Orrick
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE BRIEFING DEADLINES