Illumina, Inc. et al v. QIAGEN, N.V. et al

Filing 79

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES by Hon. William Alsup granting 78 Administrative Motion to extend.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

John L. Cooper (State Bar No. 050324)
[e-mail]
Jeffrey M. Fisher (State Bar No. 155284)
[e-mail]
Winston Liaw (State Bar No. 273899)
[e-mail]
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants QIAGEN, N.V.,
QIAGEN GmbH, QIAGEN Gaithersburg,
Inc., QIAGEN Sciences, LLC, QIAGEN Inc.
(USA),QIAGEN Redwood City, Inc., and
Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc.

10

Robert R. Baron, Jr. (PA SBN 67084)
(appearance pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Marc S. Segal (PA SBN 84474)
(appearance pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Tyler R. Marandola
(appearance pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
1735 Market Street, 51st Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19103-7599
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants QIAGEN, N.V.,
QIAGEN GmbH, QIAGEN Gaithersburg,
Inc., QIAGEN Sciences, LLC, QIAGEN Inc.
(USA), QIAGEN Redwood City, Inc., and
Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc.

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16

ILLUMINA, INC.
ILLUMINA CAMBRIDGE LTD.,

17
Plaintiffs,
18

Case No. 3:16-cv-02788-WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES

vs.
19
20
21
22

QIAGEN, N.V.
QIAGEN GmbH
QIAGEN Gaithersburg, Inc.
QIAGEN Sciences, LLC
QIAGEN Inc. (USA)
QIAGEN Redwood City, Inc.
Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc.

Judge: Hon. William Alsup
Date: N/A
Time: N/A

23
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

[Proposed Order Granting Unopposed
Administrative Motion To Extend Deadlines; Case
No. 3:16-cv-02788-WHA

33250\5546133.1

`

1

The Court has received Defendants’ Unopposed Administrative Motion to Extend

2

Deadlines, and, having considered the papers presented by the parties, the arguments of counsel,

3

and good cause appearing therefor, finds as follows:

4
5
6

Defendants’ Unopposed Administrative Motion to Extend Deadlines is GRANTED and
the schedule is modified as follows:
-

2016.

7
8

-

The deadline for the parties to serve Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26 is
extended to September 2, 2016.

9
10

The deadline for Defendants to Answer Plaintiff’s Complaint is extended to August 5,

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12

DATED:

July 27, 2016.

13

________________________________
HON. WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

[Proposed Order Granting Unopposed
Administrative Motion To Extend Deadlines; Case
No. 3:16-cv-02788-WHA`

-2-

33250\5546133.1